I'm still of the opinion the surplusses we have been seeing this year are targeting the older workforce who are grandfathered into the pension plans. T will never openly admit it, of course, but it makes a lot more sense than their explanation of why they chose who they did. ( Collaboration Zones my a– )
That said, I'll pass on what my Financial Advisor told me:
While everyone's situation is different, he looked at what my annuity would be vs a lump sum. He then calculated how much of an annual return it would take to meet or exceed what the annuity would provide. If it's in the 5-7% range, then it's doable and it basically becomes a personal choice.
As that percentage starts to creep up, however, if you're having to pull in 8-10% returns just to match what the annuity will pay out, then you have to start thinking if you -should- take the lump sum or not.
You also have to factor in any survivor / beneficiaries because adding those into your annuity can get costly on your payouts vs a lump sum.
However, if you're like me, you're questioning where AT&T will be in ten or even twenty years. If they let Randall keep driving this train, we may well find ourselves at the bottom of a cliff :| As a result, my plan is to take the lump sum once I am retirement eligible.
Of course, we'll know for sure once the bargained for contracts start renewing. If the annuity is still an option then it kind of throws water on the whole theory of T buying out pensions and going with lump sum payouts only.