Thread regarding Sam's Club layoffs

Repost from Walmart side

Karma is hell. By the time RM's like "Sasquatch" and MM's like "Tiny Tim" get what is coming to them, I will be living easy and laughing over an adult beverage. Good luck to all the little people who work where the rubber meets the road in the upcoming weeks.

The repost:

I feel for everyone who is losing their job over the idiocracy of the Home Office. I spent 10 years in the Home Office and during the last 4 years of that I saw the same thing - good people being fired. Ofttimes, because they make too much. Ageism was a huge part of it. Targeting those over 50 along with those making too much money in the eyes of the company. Included in that was people who had the audacity to use their health benefits. (Walmart is self-insured. That could not estimate their costs year-to-year to save their soul. Every year they were underwater.) They then started targeting the remaining associates they wanted gone by giving them bad evaluations. That was the kiss of death for your career at Walmart. By doing this, you were not entitled to any severance package or unemployment. (And Walmart skimped on the Vaseline during all of this.)

And you ask yourself why as you find yourself without a job? It's simple. Walmart has become run by a bunch of incompetent village id–ts. (Home Office) They thought they were King S#!t sitting on top of the mountain. They rested on their laurels. They allowed Amazon to pass them by while they sat there thinking because they were the biggest, they were the best. Not anymore. Plus, too many other retailers have emerged as better over-all than Walmart.

As for me? I left of my own volition. (You can demand more money while employed.) I took a side trip making a little more money but got laid off after 2 years. I landed on my feet making $30k more than my last year at Walmart.

I now use Walmart as my very last shopping option. I shop at the Dollar stores, Aldi's, Whole Food's, Trader Joe's and Fresh Thyme where the employees are treated better. It's my personal boycott. It won't make much of a difference to the bottom line. But it makes me feel better because of the horrific treatment of their associates.

by
| 2132 views | | 11 replies (last February 26, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+13E0ePsv

11 replies (most recent on top)

2hdp has it correct.

I work at home office and have seen it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3gtu+13E0ePsv

@2ugr

A year ago I too was a manager, and I was told by my MM to alter completed evaluations because our market had not given enough low ratings. I saw the writing on the wall and left the company. 2hdp is spot on.

And you are a company shill.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ftu+13E0ePsv

I’m a manager and I can tell you right now. Associates are not rated on experience. Change is hard for people sometimes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ugr+13E0ePsv

@1nng The Home Office has gone to a burn and churn aka forced rankings method for their evaluations.

Breaking it down, a certain % of associates are mandatorily ranked in the 5 groups of needs improvement, below expectations, meets expectations, exceed expectations and role model regardless of actual performance. Performance no longer matters much.

Now, these are hypothetical percentages and I have no way to really know what they are but 15% are designated as needs improvement and will be termed; 10% will be below expectations and given a slim chance to improve; and 64% will be ranked as meets expectations. These bottom 3 ranks will get no pay increase. 10% will be ranked above expectations and get some semblance of a pay raise while the remaining 1% get the promotions and higher pay raises.

This is how it works. I was witness to this at the Home Office. I saw associates of 20+ years with exceeds expectations or higher on every evaluation suddenly get a below expectations. How does an associate manage that after 20 years in the Home Office? It's to get rid or people making too much money.

This method has filtered down to the stores including changing the rules such as no incentive or pay raise if you have too many points.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hdp+13E0ePsv

who told you that they gave to coach associates with tenure? I’m wanting to know where you got this info?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nng+13E0ePsv

managers are made to give bad evals and are also told to coach associates and threatened with a coaching if they dont do so ..this company wants to get rid of associates with tenure also associates that that have health problems plain and simple they dont want to pay out the benefits

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ytr+13E0ePsv

Managers are not made to give bad evals. Just ignorance if you believe that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fly+13E0ePsv

this post is 100% accurate. If you don't work that the HO then you dont know. Managers are made to give bad evals, they don't have an option. People are targeted for their age, salary and tenure.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1iaa+13E0ePsv

Tissue needed by @uno

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jbw+13E0ePsv

Accurate post by OP. Some just don't see it or chose not to.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mff+13E0ePsv

You’re a joke, obviously by the way you’re talking. You made shhhhh money in home office. Don’t come in here acting like some hot shot in home office acting like you know what you’re talking about. Years of experience and money doesn’t mean anything. Don’t get out worked by young guys and you won’t get eliminated. All decisions on cuts are strictly business. All cuts are made to help grow the business. Audit team, unneeded. Accounting, unneeded. Cutting the fat off management, needed.
If you’re good, you get moved when your job is displaced. Not eliminated

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uno+13E0ePsv

Post a reply

: