Thread regarding Shell Oil layoffs

Shell Bangalore's value addition

Under the “able” leadership of Ben and YL, Shell appears to be setting in the West like the sun. Before Shell finally sets, it is worth taking a hard look at what Shell Bangalore has actually contributed to the company.

Beyond facilitating cross-postings for Indian employees, enabling some to eventually become naturalized Western citizens, and creating opportunities for a number of 35- to 40-year-old Indians to move into JG2 and JG1 positions, what tangible value has Bangalore delivered to Shell’s bottom line?

Supporting projects during the Assess and Select phases is hardly a unique or differentiating contribution. Other P&T hubs, at least, are tied to country-specific assets and operations. Bangalore has no comparable asset base.

There is also a legitimate question about the impact Bangalore has had on international talent mobility. Since its establishment, Western engineers appear to have had far fewer opportunities for cross-postings to Southeast Asia and the Middle East, while Bangalore has increasingly dominated these assignments.

If the primary beneficiaries of this model have been employees in India rather than Shell as a whole, then the fundamental question is straightforward: has the establishment and expansion of Bangalore actually created value for Shell, or has it primarily redistributed opportunities within the organization?

After two decades, Shell should be able to answer that question with hard numbers—not anecdotes, headcount, or internal career progression, but measurable impact on the company’s bottom line.


by
| 161 views | | 20 replies (last 7 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m27yw8gc

20 replies (most recent on top)

@hc
Nobody wants to move to India except a few greedy ones who do not mind exposing their spouses to cancer causing pollution or who do not mind making their kids eat adulterated food or who do not mind breaking their backs on pot-holed filled roads of Bangalore.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @19x+1m27yw8gc

@mj how ‘bout no DEI / equity?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mq+1m27yw8gc

Really, level the playing field DEI everywhere or nowhere!

DEI quotas in each country and all job groups and classes not just for air conditioned offices but for dangerous dirty work too!

Fair everywhere or fair nowhere! Not racist or s-xist nor religious bigotry.

It is wrong to expect the working group to be one class/group and the leadership be given in a non-representative fraction to another group. Instead strive for overall equity not elitist equity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mj+1m27yw8gc

@ma ya, that must be it, it’s the only possible explanation!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mb+1m27yw8gc

@m7

Imagine being so cuckoo with DEI that you think ethnically homogenous banks that only give loans to their own kind are a good thing and celebratory.

Racism card only works when they play it, I guess

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ma+1m27yw8gc

@m1 beauty! ‘Racism’: the universal get-out-of-jail-free card for pretentious and sanctimonious DEI advocates!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @m7+1m27yw8gc

@m1

You have made something up. Indians own all of the gas stations due to fraudulent loans. The work a gas station for their family on a J-1 Visa therefore eliminating an american job until they convert to green card. You are literally being proud of their layered fraud.

And before you say “nobody wants that job”, yes they do actually. Also when you let businesses hire for sketchy wages by using sketchy labor, such that only people running scams and haunt government benefits can afford to work it, all you are doing is wage suppression and tax dollar waste. Wake up. If nobody was there to work those jobs unlawfully, then either the business would close to where would go up. That’s how capitalism works when people don’t cheat.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @m4+1m27yw8gc

@kx Then, while sympathetic to your fear . . . you aren't wanted or needed. It's one thing to recognize problems with DEI approaches in the company. It is something else to be blatantly racist. Those Indians who run gas stations in America? They have a large investing network. They often work in the stations, which is hard work - the kind Americans used to do in the West to launch the nation. They are better than you, and I am not an Indian saying that. You are encouraged to go find other work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @m1+1m27yw8gc

@kr no way, dude.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kx+1m27yw8gc

@hc ya hire some headhunters to recruit the best managers of 7-11 slurpee stations.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kc+1m27yw8gc

@h5

That’s an excellent point. I think diversity would bring great strength to our Indian Hubs. They should import some Malaysians or Pakistanis immediately to grow stronger. I’m sure that nobody could possibly argue with this since diversity is always good and always our strength and key to value generation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hc+1m27yw8gc

Maybe they could add more value if they had more diversity in India. Doesn't it seem like they mostly hire Indians in India? Where's the DEI? shouldn't they set the example and hire at least 40% who aren't Indian in India, just like they attempt to do in the USA?

DEI everywhere or nowhere!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h5+1m27yw8gc

Expensive remote assistants, good at nothing, bad at everything.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gf+1m27yw8gc

The biggest axxhxle out of India is Aman Chauhan though he calls himself Australian. Thinks exploration is a waste and uses all his energy in spewing nonsense

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c2+1m27yw8gc

If it can be done without going to the office and without involving an asset, then it can be done with AI!

I want to hear zero complaints from Indians who have said for years that Shell needs to reduce costs at all costs. If they complain when it is their turn to be replaced by something cheaper, then they are hypocrites.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c0+1m27yw8gc

@bb i know the first expat Dutchies and yanks. They absolutely hated the shxthxle dirty country. They were used to KL and other luxery countries. They had no choice anymore they suffered, 10 years ago BLR was much worse.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bt+1m27yw8gc

The India move has been a failure since the footprint and sourcing. Other O&G which followed suit is facing the same predicament. The so called 'cheaper cost' which has been paraded is a smokescreen for the immense reasoning failure of this move. Need to go back to Shell days prior to the announcement 2014/2015, infact even 2008 to go back to the glory years. Getting rid of Shell India needs to be the first step, and moving back to those who can actually understand and work, and not provide gibberish answers and end results. IYKYK

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bs+1m27yw8gc

An experiment to see how much work could be done outside of US and London to reduce labor costs. They still charged a lot internally/externally so that it could be a money -maker with partners. I didn't see much that was usable, but still the Early Dutch colonial managers in Bangalore crowed so much about their successful projects that it lingered and morphed (success measured by "we reported out.")

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1m27yw8gc

Footprint and sourcing 2016, yes I am insider. Get rid of KL staff and global 'dead wood'. It worked. Next step: package SBO commodity servicesike IT ops and sell to TATA / Cognizant etc.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b9+1m27yw8gc

Failed experiment, moving on. I for one am just glad we did it first before Exx and Chev, which both seem to be in growth mode there. I can’t see us FOMO’ing back in, or maybe I’m giving our corporate memory too much credit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aj+1m27yw8gc

Post a reply

: