Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

I can’t help but compare the disaster that has been unfolding at Boeing to where Wells Fargo is most certainly heading.

Will lives be lost due to greed and negligence in Leadership? No. But is there an impending technology, security, risk, regulatory disaster?? I would put good money on it.

“New management at Boeing drove the message that cash flow and profitability - delivering returns to shareholders - had become Boeing’s top goal.”

“Problems have plagued the manufacturer, and many current and former employees blame its focus on making planes more quickly. Employees often faced intense pressure to meet production deadlines, sometimes leading to questionable practices that they feared could compromise quality and safety.”

“Layoffs forced out employees with vast institutional knowledge, who were replaced with lower-waged inexperienced workers.”

Guess which consulting firm Boeing uses to drive their “operational efficiency and performance outcomes”? That would be McKinsey & Company.

by
| 1433 views | | 19 replies (last April 2, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1rLVwHhT

19 replies (most recent on top)

It’s happening all over again. Managers have lost touch with reality - they’re demanding impossible deadlines be met. Only way to meet those deadlines is to cut corners = ethics violations.
It’s as if they have completely forgotten 2016. If anyone speaks out they are gone. We all know how this ends. Mark my words.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5oqo+1rLVwHhT

Executives are not worried about anything because they can always bail out themselves. Remember Carrie T? She got a fancy golden parachute also and didn't even go to prison.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3xne+1rLVwHhT

Don't worry, if something goes wrong, Charlie will get his golden parachute.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3yuq+1rLVwHhT

And its fun to look back and try to figure out where the sc--ws are in who is sc... ing who.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3skb+1rLVwHhT

Well just like Boeing, WF is missing a bunch of bolts. We have plenty of nuts.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3zoc+1rLVwHhT

Unfortunately for us, the original plan when Charlie was hired was to have us merge into or be bought up by another Bank. That was plan A and plan B. However, because he couldn't get the FED limit off of us, now we've been in plan C and D which they didn't anticipate. So hence all the flailing around with Agile, stupid implementations business line changes, re-orgs and all the rest of it. He had ONE job, he failed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2vkp+1rLVwHhT

CEO Dave Calhoun Leaps From Boeing, Saved by Golden Parachute

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/boeing-ceo-dave-calhoun-exits-saved-by-golden-parachute.html

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jwd+1rLVwHhT

Or is it a case of the unions? I mean outsourcing doesn't sc--w in a bolt for the door or install a wheel. Maybe the unions are getting lazy?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1aot+1rLVwHhT

Check out this Forbes 2/23/24 article titled "Boeing Is Haunted By Two Decades Of Outsourcing" https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevebanker/2024/02/12/boeing-is-haunted-by-two-decades-of-outsourcing/?sh=246a270364a1

WF is at the very beginning of this process. Pretty soon our friends in India will announce a grand and glorious "virtual banking infrastructure" that all of WF tech will need to rely on.

This article details how Boeing is now a case study in how not to outsource a supply chain. In a decade WF may will be a study in how not to outsource banking business processes. While the sign will not be doors flying off of branches they will appear issues since we all know the quality of WF tech's quality management.

Here is a gemini summary:

The article discusses how Boeing's extensive outsourcing practices have resulted in quality issues and safety problems with their airplanes. Historically, Boeing manufactured most parts of its airplanes itself. However, in the past two decades, they've outsourced a significant portion of the design, engineering, and manufacturing to numerous suppliers. This approach aimed to save costs and speed up production time.
The article highlights several lessons Boeing should have learned from outsourcing:
• Close supplier relationships are crucial: Boeing failed to develop strong relationships with its suppliers, hindering communication and coordination throughout the supply chain.
• Quality management is essential: Outsourcing doesn't absolve Boeing of the responsibility for ensuring quality. Recent incidents point to problems with Boeing's oversight of both their own factories and their suppliers' operations.
• Technology is not a silver bullet: Advanced software cannot replace proper management practices. While Boeing utilized sophisticated design software, they lacked robust quality control processes.
The article concludes by mentioning that Airbus, Boeing's competitor, has also outsourced production but hasn't faced similar safety issues. This suggests that Boeing's problems stem from their management approach to outsourcing, not outsourcing itself.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ikf+1rLVwHhT

Yayyy!!! McKinsey once more.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jqs+1rLVwHhT

@gpm

https://www.wral.com/story/wells-fargo-overcharged-military-members-lawsuit-says/21347945/

https://businessden.com/2024/03/27/zeppelin-development-station-default-receiver/

https://www.investmentnews.com/advisor-moves/news/raymond-james-signs-243m-advisor-from-wells-fargo-251580

https://www.investmentnews.com/advisor-moves/news/lpl-welcomes-250m-team-from-wells-fargo-251556

...I mean sh-t flies off of this stagecoach all the time if you are looking.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bns+1rLVwHhT

A more applicable Boeing story would involve airlines using their systems which over charge passengers for a very watered down Jack n Coke.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gnu+1rLVwHhT

I can't stand WF in general and yet can't see how Boeing's situation is a cautionary tale for the bank.

Corporate greed is all the same while the operational context between aerospace and banking is vastly different.

OP's post is well written, though it teeters more towards the sensationalistic side. Maybe we can replace Boeing with a more like-for-like situation. WF vs BoA, etc.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ags+1rLVwHhT

get back to me when a door flies off at wf.................................................

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gpm+1rLVwHhT

It will be another Bud Light.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @grr+1rLVwHhT

This makes a lot of sense, especially in the areas of technology and change delivery. I've been noticing the downhill spiral for some time.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fgq+1rLVwHhT

Last Week Tonight with John Oliver had an episode about McKinsey. It was eye opening.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wdh+1rLVwHhT

I always think back to Enron

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eja+1rLVwHhT

Our story will be more like Sears, but I see where you're going with this.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iqe+1rLVwHhT

Post a reply

: