Thread regarding Nike Inc. layoffs

Leadership is not a position. It is not a title. It is a responsibility.

And these empty-headed, self-serving, a-s-kissing executives, VPs, SDs, and ads all seem ignorant of what leadership actually means-or what it means to take care of your teammates. That's the first rule in sport.

Even the world's greatest individual athletes understand this.

Look at Carlos Alcaraz, Jannik Sinner, Rory McIlroy, Scottie Scheffler, or Vincent Luis. These are elite individual competitors, yet they understand that individual greatness is built on the strength of a team.

They surround themselves with talented subject-matter experts - coaches, trainers, strategists, and advisors. People who bring different perspectives, challenge their thinking, offer honest opinions, and contribute ideas that are DIFFERENT from their own.

And they're genuinely grateful for those people. They recognize that their success depends on the collective talent, commitment, and trust of the team around them.

They don't demand blind loyalty, surround themselves with yes-men, or confuse agreement with competence.

Imagine that. The world's best athletes understand something that Nike's senior leadership apparently doesn't.

Great leaders don't need to be the smartest person in the room. They build teams of exceptional people, listen to them, empower them, challenge them, and, above all, take care of them.

That's how you build trust. That's how you build winning teams. And that's how you build enduring organizations.

Leadership is not about being in charge. Leadership is about taking care of those in your charge.

Nike should understand that better than anyone.

It's sport. It's teamwork. It's leadership. And it's supposed to be in our DNA.

Beautifully said, @ew+1m4nvpzdx.


by
| 124 views | | 8 replies (last 29 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m4tdnkpb

8 replies (most recent on top)

Actually it is just a job. Just like you, if they weren't getting paid they wouldn't be here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h2+1m4tdnkpb

well it's obvious that Nike has no leadership

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h0+1m4tdnkpb

@fe So people who would just be senior managers at other companies are making $500K with fancy titles, while the rest of us minions struggle to climb through all these 40, 45, and 50 levels? No wonder Nike is so top-heavy lol

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gv+1m4tdnkpb

@fe and they sure as sh-t get their fair share. Unincorporated Washington county anyone?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ga+1m4tdnkpb

Nike SD is roughly manager level at a normal business, not even senior manager. Senior managers tend to manage teams of around 15-30. A typical Nike SD barely has a team of 5-10 which half of them are directors with a single headcount

all designed to rob the company and defraud shareholders while enriching their gym buddies.

Nike is nor a serious business, it is a glorified jobs program for the state of oregon

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fe+1m4tdnkpb

@cy Nike has a +1-2 level title inflation for anyone not an IC

Directors are basically managers

Senior Directors are basically senior managers

first level VP's are Directors

Second level VPs are Senior Directors

EVPs are just VPs

It's so bloody stupid the level of title inflation to give excuses to give your gym buddy bigger salaries. In business world, the position of Director was created as someone with the legal authority to sign contracts on behalf of the company. How many directors at Nike do you know that have budgetary discretion to do that?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d5+1m4tdnkpb

Are SDs really considered senior leadership? I’ve reported to 3 different SDs who all told me I was ready for a promotion, but they either ended up leaving or moving me to another team, leaving me hanging every time

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cy+1m4tdnkpb

haha...really ..u think so ??? its called FU--ING PRIVILEAGE...you peasant class will never know it :D keep busting your a-s

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1m4tdnkpb

Post a reply

: