Thread regarding Shell Oil layoffs

What's the latest on the Shell Chemicals bids

Exxon? Kuwait? Lyondell? Private Equity?

Hearing no one wants every site and it might get parted out


by
| 315 views | | 14 replies (last October 8) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m3t84j1h

14 replies (most recent on top)

@19k I’m pretty sure ALL downstream now has very similar org charts. I know Europe went with combiningTech/Engineering leadership. I just think in general Shell is trying to downsize and save money. I mean look at how chemicals doesn’t have PSM supporting a site directly. Just asking for an incident.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ct+1m3t84j1h

@19p that's a fair assessment

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @19r+1m3t84j1h

@19k well the Geismar reorg and all of chemicals would make sense to be similar to Exxon since Emma worked at Exxon. That is what she knows works.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @19p+1m3t84j1h

@ej I wouldn't be surprised if Exxon takes all of Norco. The word is the re-org at Geismar and now Norco closely resemble Exxon org alignment

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @19k+1m3t84j1h

@f8 is Mont Belvieu computational team Reliance subsidiary?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tz+1m3t84j1h

@f8 most but I don’t believe it’s enough to supply the full need at geismar

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j5+1m3t84j1h

@ej there are news articles out there that specifically mention Norco being part of the package deal. Sounded strange to me as well since they typically haven’t been lumped in with Chemicals

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j4+1m3t84j1h

@ee Most of Geismar's ethylene comes from Mont Belvieu's computational team.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f8+1m3t84j1h

@ee Norco chemicals is not part of chemicals being sold. Norco is still considered an energy park and they don’t split them. Last year when Emma took over chemicals, Norco was with refining.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ej+1m3t84j1h

Pretty sure Norco Chemicals is of interest to Exxon as well. I believe they need the ethylene it produces because current pipeline can’t supply what’s needed at Geismar

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ee+1m3t84j1h

Can computational team be based at Deer Park?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dz+1m3t84j1h

@a2 I could see Exxon wanting Monaca and Geismar. Geismar sends a decent amount of AO to Exxon for there synthetic lube oils, so that would be a good fit. Deer Park honestly I am surprised how that site is even profitable with the amount of staff and the few units running.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cn+1m3t84j1h

No one wants chemicals

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ba+1m3t84j1h

@OP parted out seems most likely. Exxon knows polymers the best and could extract most value from Monaca. Ge-z their whole business team is former Exxon hires already. Anyone would be interested in Geismar for HODer. Deer park would be least attractive in my mind but based on rudimentary knowledge of the situation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1m3t84j1h

Post a reply

: