@xm They are asking the min number of direct reports "required" for each level.
RM should NLT 8
Director ?
VP ?
AVP ?
No clue
@xm They are asking the min number of direct reports "required" for each level.
RM should NLT 8
Director ?
VP ?
AVP ?
No clue
@xm no clue what this is supposed to ask?
So what would a "healthy" manager to direct ration at all levels?
@hk True. Family relative on H1B.
To say Oracle is bloated with middle tier manager's is quite an understatement, didn’t someone here report of a D that had single M who had single IC reporting to them? LOL.
@gk The ratio of Ds to ICs and Ms is incredibly high. Ds should be managing several Ms and the Ms should be managing at least 2-3 times the Ms count of ICs. A reorganization of middle management would make sense without affecting the VPs and ICs.
@f4 - at what level? how would this work? Would VPs really want to deal with ICs
@bq targeting them for RIF.
What's this mean? Hiring more middle management or they are targeted in the rif?