Thread regarding IBM layoffs

IBM can’t afford an unreliable cloud

https://www.infoworld.com/article/4041727/ibm-cant-afford-an-unreliable-cloud.html

The article discussed "IBM Cloud experienced its fourth major outage since May,"

"These outages couldn’t come at a worse time for IBM. With healthcare, finance, manufacturing, and other industries increasingly depending on AI-driven technologies, companies are focused on cloud reliability. AI workloads require real-time data processing, continuity, and reliable scaling to work effectively. For most organizations, disruptions caused by control-plane failures could lead to catastrophic AI system failures."

"IBM has reached a critical juncture. In today’s competitive market, cloud reliability is the baseline expectation, not a value-added bonus. IBM’s repeated failures—particularly at the control-plane level—fundamentally undermine its positioning as a trusted enterprise cloud partner. For many customers, these outages may serve as the final justification to migrate workloads elsewhere."

"To recover, IBM must focus on transforming its control-plane architecture, ensuring transparency, and reaffirming its commitment to reliability through clear, actionable changes. Meanwhile, enterprises should see this as a reminder that resilience must be built into their cloud strategies to safeguard their operations, regardless of provider."

MY OPINION: I don't think that AK knows Cloud. It is supposed to be his background, but I think he is mediocre, but of course, a good politician and how he got the big gig.

Here's why I say this: If anything should not fail is CLOUD. This is where he can show whether he deserved the big job or not. If he can't get his domain of expertise right, then what can investors expect in terms of Quantum, AI, etc?

He was working on this cr-p years before he got the big job.

Investors: Hey, AK, if you can't figure Cloud out after all these years, how can we trust you with the rest?


by
| 1127 views | | 5 replies (last August 22) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k39ewqwq

5 replies (most recent on top)

Alvind has a PhD but he’s what I call stupid smart. He’s not good at leadership . He’s not good at business sense at all. I know when making major acquisitions you pay a premium but Alvind and Ginny got played like fiddles

Krabanaugh looks and sounds Stup1d. How in the eff does that cl0d merit millions in perks ?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ax+1k39ewqwq

@ae

Alvind and Krabanaugh can't sit the right way on a toilet seat, so how do you expect them to know anything about the cloud ? They just pretend to know by nodding their heads sagely but you never get clear answers. Just a lot of handwaving and gesturing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1k39ewqwq

@ab

AK was touting how Kyndryl continued to provide services to IBM after the spin-off.

The Transition Services Agreement (TSA) outlined the provision of services after the spin-off for 2 year. It ended in November of 2023, but it could have been renewed, extended, renegotiated, whatever.

Kyndryl was and is still losing money, but the point is, why not the above? Most importantly, AK's job is to figure out how to win and Cloud is his thing, isn't it?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1k39ewqwq

Running a public cloud requires basic competencies in IT infrastructure management services. Server management, networking, applications. Security and system administration. Establishing appropriate policies and procedures that work for multiple service providers and multiple customers.

The only problem IBM faces is that it got rid of all those competencies when it spun off Kyndryl...oops! IBM is a server vendor, a software vendor, and a consulting shop. They are not a cloud shop, and unless they build up all those skills they never will be.

The bottom line: IBM isn't equipped to run a public cloud...so don't hire them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1k39ewqwq

@OP

AK's direct involvement with IBM's cloud business started in January 2015 and it was a promotion. He then got involved with the Red Hat acqusition. AK continued to emphasize Cloud since becoming CEO, Apr 2020.

We are talking about several different promotions since 2015 related to cloud (I consider the involvement in the Red Hat process as a promotion).

The point is, one needs to measure AK's performance for the past 10-11 years.

But, nobody high-up thinks of him in this manner?

I was just reading about the Target CEO the other day. He didn't last for too long. He was expected to know what he was doing due to his background, why isn't it the same with AK and his gang + family + friends + neighbors?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1k39ewqwq

Post a reply

: