Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Quit your complaining - go get your vaccine!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/vaccine-mandate-federal-employees/2021/09/09/1c1ce9dc-116b-11ec-882f-2dd15a067dc4_story.html

companies over 100 people and all of Federal

by
| 2867 views | | 31 replies (last September 14, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1cKOKS7h

31 replies (most recent on top)

https://www.postaltimes.com/postalnews/update-on-required-covid-vaccines-for-postal-workers/

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5ggc+1cKOKS7h

Postal workers are not exempt from the vaccine mandate, despite some early reporting suggesting otherwise: https://www.postaltimes.com/postalnews/white-house-clarifies-usps-workers-will-be-subject-to-vaccine-mandate/

From the article: "The White House issued a clarification late Thursday after the Washington Post, citing an official, reported USPS workers were not required to get the shot and were only being “strongly encouraged” to do so.

Postal workers will have a choice between getting the vaccine and getting tested for COVID-19 once a week, a Biden administration official clarified, subjecting those workers to the rules being imposed on business of 100 employees or more, as opposed to the rules for federal employees.

'USPS is not included in the executive order requiring vaccination of Federal employees. USPS has a separate statutory scheme and is traditionally independent of federal personnel actions like this,' a Biden administration official said."

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5taq+1cKOKS7h

Just so everyone is clear, the guy who said postal workers are not included in the mandate is making that up.

Or, you know, lying.

They are included, and I wish everyone would learn to first listen, does something sound real, and if not, look it up, and always, always, know who is telling you something.

Serial liars fill the right wing airwaves and social media and it's hurting real Americans.

Vaccines save lives.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ffz+1cKOKS7h

Hey @2gkv+1cKOKS7h please show your work.

Where does it say in the actual order what you're making up from thin air?

So tired of covidiots making up stories to make themselves feel special.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2iqq+1cKOKS7h

Might as well shut down the thread mods, you already censored all the actual information in it. At least a dozen posts are missing now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2nwk+1cKOKS7h

Funny how Biden's team is exempt from the mandate. And Postal Workers. You know, the people handling contaminated boxes from all over the country and then fanning out and visiting literally every house in the country. No reason for them to be jabbed at ALL.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2gkv+1cKOKS7h

The greatest generation won over fascism in the 40s in a United effort. In the 60s, America came together to put a man on the moon in less than 10 years, an incredible feat with the technology at the time.

As late as September 11, 2001, the country was United. I think it’s safe to say it would never happen now. We would fail to meet such a challenge.

America has a lot of growing up to do. I personally don’t think we’re up to it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vgh+1cKOKS7h

End this pandemic? It’s now only inside the heads of vaccinated and the govt liking the emergency powers. Everyone else already moved on and adapted to living with covid.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qba+1cKOKS7h

I don’t think it has enough teeth.

No airplanes
No public transportation
No restaurants
No sporting events
Basically nowhere people gather without vaccination.

Period.

No one has the guts to do what it takes to REALLY pretty much end this pandemic, although pretty much every other civilized nation has done so.

What does that make us?

You act like a third world country, you get treated like one. The Florida resident found that out from the rest of the world before he was shown the door.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jbl+1cKOKS7h

Nuremberg Code of 1947:

"The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This
means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent;
should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without
the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching,
or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient
knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved
as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision."

Taking away someone's means of gainful employment, not just where they currently work but at most businesses and gov agencies across the country is CLEARLY coercion. Saying 'oh, but you could start a lemonade stand' is a farce and only serves to prove the power of the coercion. It also ignores the fact that they will eventually come for every business, even self employed people. Just a matter of time.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zhe+1cKOKS7h

@1dvx+1cKOKS7h

Wrong. You won't be "free" to do anything. What they are attempting to do is an incremental approach of divide/conquer. So it starts with one group with a mandate, and they simply keep adding groups until you are left with a tiny mass of people, unemployed, beaten down, unable to go anywhere or do anything without the right 'papers', and as the rest of the population falls victim to all the side effects of a weakened immune system, that tiny minority will be blamed, and that's when the final order comes to exterminate them. That's exactly what's happening. Divide, conquer, rinse and repeat until what's left is a small enough group that it's politically viable to get rid of them. It's happened countless times throughout history. There are people here already calling for / reveling in the death and suffering of those that refuse. All because government propaganda has turned them against their neighbor.

Imagine if the same thing happened in the 1980s with people that got HIV/AIDS. Constant attacks against the victims of the disease, blaming them for the ills of others, taking away their jobs, and finally rounding them all up. Can you imagine? It's horrific, but it's what's going to happen right now in 2021-2022 unless these tyrants are stopped.

You can be pro-vaccination and anti-mandate/tyranny. All you have to do is believe in the human right not to be forced to be a medical test subject.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xsv+1cKOKS7h

Why did @1sei+1cKOKS7h get downvoted? All that person did was explain how it works.

Man, when you can't just relate a process without getting dragged things are pretty messed up.

Your employer and the government can absolutely require a vaccination, and you can absolutely refuse.

And you are more than free to find another employer or start your own business.

Or you are free to run for office and change the laws.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dvx+1cKOKS7h

One word: OSHA

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xvg+1cKOKS7h

Biden is not "mandating" this from his seat - he does not have the constitutional authority to do that. But the DOL can.

What he said was that the DOL will be creating the mandate. So for all of you constitutional scholars on the thread - might want to go read up about how it works. Laws are indeed created by congress. Regs are created by govt bodies that have been empowered by law with the ability to do so.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1sei+1cKOKS7h

@1kqp+1cKOKS7h

Sure, but not without accomodations for exemptions, and in any event the President of the US has no authority to force businesses to make that decision. That's the problem here. If WF wanted to have a mandate, we'd already have one. Coercion from the White House is unconstitutional and immoral.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1stj+1cKOKS7h

Your employer can require a vaccination just like they can require pants.

Now, if you all want to go on a pants strike and go full Porky Pig I'm in.

Fight the man! My created didn't create me with pants on!

I work from home, so that's just another day at the office for me.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kqp+1cKOKS7h

I wonder how things would've gone had this been Ebola.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qfj+1cKOKS7h

They can ram a foot long qtip into my brain every day I'm in the office, if they want. No consent for injections.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mbt+1cKOKS7h

Don't want to be vaxxed? Get tested at least weekly. If the government didn't require it, many businesses would've all on their own eventually.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1sjf+1cKOKS7h

@1mim+1cKOKS7h

Are you "totally on board" with every law that's ever been passed in DC?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1uzk+1cKOKS7h

@1mim+1cKOKS7h

No, I'm saying the process would be constitutional / legal. Still subject to being tossed by the courts, as every law is, and something being legal certainly does not equal moral. Regardless, the Potted Plant dictating anything from DC is completely unamerican, undemocratic, and immoral. Cheering on dictatorship because right now at this second the Dear Leader is doing things you agree with is insanity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vuc+1cKOKS7h

Are you saying that if the Senate or the House were to introduce a bill requiring COVID vaccinations, both houses were to pass it, and the President were to sign it into law, you'd be totally on board?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mim+1cKOKS7h

@1ywu+1cKOKS7h

Yes, because that's completely analogous to forced injections regardless of medical advice from a non-consenting patient!

Presidents don't make law, bottom line. It's questionable whether the President can legally / morally force this upon the executive branch (while excluding his own staff, equal protection?), but there is absolutely no question that he has zero authority to mandate anything outside the executive branch. If you missed civics: the House of Reps initiates spending bills, once they pass there, the Senate generally passes a similar law. Then they hammer out the details and vote on the final version. If a majority in each house votes "yes", then the bill goes to the White House. The President either signs it, vetoes it, or ignores it. If he/she signs it, it becomes law. Even then it might be ki---d by the courts, but that the simplified version of how something becomes law in the United States. Things don't become law because a senile old white man in DC makes a single handed declaration on TV. IF that's how things work, then we have a dictatorship. Is that how you want things to work? After everything humanity experienced in the 20th century, you STILL think dictators running medical experiments on the masses is the way to go?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vhp+1cKOKS7h

"Push back against this government overreach now or it will only get worse."

I mean, RIGHT?! For all we know, they could start searching our luggage when we fly, or ban smoking in public areas, or require licenses to drive.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ywu+1cKOKS7h

Push back against this government overreach now or it will only get worse.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hzh+1cKOKS7h

Or tested weekly. Will WF pay for my weekly testing to avoid a lawsuit?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fwd+1cKOKS7h

Charlie tries and force me to get this I won't take it. I'm also going to sue the sh1t out of this place.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hes+1cKOKS7h

'Don't underestimate Joe's ability to (expletive) things up'.

  • Barack Obama
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1npp+1cKOKS7h

Meh, that anti-vaxxers are all talk. Once they realize there's no company they can run to that doesn't require vaccines or testing, they'll fold like a lawn chair.

Either that, or the dawn of tiny 99-person startups is upon us.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nbh+1cKOKS7h

Great news

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @szb+1cKOKS7h

Finally!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @onq+1cKOKS7h

Post a reply

: