Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

RCSA layoffs

Anyone from rcsa get laid off?

by
| 3260 views | | 11 replies (last December 21, 2022) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kac95Pt

11 replies (most recent on top)

The Wolff should definitely get the ax, worthless as the day is long. Bloated POS.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8mmv+1kac95Pt

@4jew all true. However Feds love it. 4 other large banks are now looking into the WF RCSA as a model. Whether here or there I have 10 years until retirement and I may be able to ride it out!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4dji+1kac95Pt

RCSA here - no chance they are laying anyone off when every single project is off track with a massive amount of resources thrown at it. We need all the people we can get to add non-value added discussion to the ridiculous amount of risks we have now. Most our business doesn't even actually control. Plus we need to talk about these ridiculous risks over and over and over for weeks. Every single word has to have input from PWC, IRM, IT&V and their moms and dads.

It's beyond painful and d-mb that the WF is spending this kind of money to word smith all these risks and taking our business partners away from their actual day jobs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4jew+1kac95Pt

@1kio. Too many people email in internet speak instead of coherent sentences.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2nxo+1kac95Pt

rcsa has been cancelled

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1uzi+1kac95Pt

No.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yfi+1kac95Pt

@1gyr+1kac95Pt Do you work here? Half the people I work with can’t string a sentence together. OP strikes me as totally working here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kio+1kac95Pt

We need the RCsA people to keep making record players.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rte+1kac95Pt

Pretty obvious OP doesn’t work here, phrasing doesn’t even make sense.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gyr+1kac95Pt

Don't they have attrition problems? I heard they actually gave out retention bonuses for them. I doubt they're laying anyone off

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vfn+1kac95Pt

Give me a break pal

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cru+1kac95Pt

Post a reply

: