Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

dialogue

Student:
I was laid off from the bank last week. After everything I gave to them. It feels wrong.

Teacher:
Laid off, you say. Were you expecting it?

Student:
Not really. Our team hit targets. I thought I was safe.

Teacher:
And what do you mean by "wrong"? Do you mean unfair?

Student:
Yes. Unfair. I worked hard, stayed late, played by their rules. Then—gone. No warning.

Teacher:
Tell me, what is the purpose of a bank?

Student:
To manage money. To provide financial services. Credit, loans, investments.

Teacher:
Does a bank exist to reward loyalty?

Student (hesitates):
Not directly, I suppose. It’s about profit. Shareholders.

Teacher:
So if a bank’s goal is profit, and you were laid off to preserve that goal, is that inconsistent with its purpose?

Student:
From their perspective, no. But it still feels wrong.

Teacher:
Ah. Then perhaps the feeling of wrongness comes not from their values—but from yours?

Student:
Maybe. I believed in the work. In helping people. In responsibility. But I guess they don’t see it that way.

Teacher:
Did your belief guide your actions while working?

Student:
Yes. I advised clients with honesty. I thought that mattered.

Teacher:
Then your values were real. But if an institution does not honor those same values, is it a surprise it does not honor those who embody them?

Student:
So… you're saying I was misplacing my trust?

Teacher:
I ask only: should one expect virtue from a system not built upon virtue?

Student:
That’s a hard truth.

Teacher:
Hard truths, like hard currencies, are often more valuable. Tell me—do you regret acting with integrity?

Student:
No. That part I’m proud of.

Teacher:
Then you have not lost your wealth—only your wages.

Student (pauses):
That’s a comforting way to put it.

Teacher:
Not comfort—clarity. There are banks that store money, and there are banks of character. Which one do you want to invest in next?

by
| 2112 views | | 12 replies (last July 24) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k0d2fen6

12 replies (most recent on top)

@18m PREACH!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @18w+1k0d2fen6

@n9 He said it on one of his first calls. He said it weirded him out how we called each other team members. He said he even talked about it with his daughters who thought it was weird. He said team members should be used for athletic teams and not in business. So, basically he started out his tenure by telling his staff that it’s a dog eat dog world out there and you shouldn’t care about anyone else but yourself. Kind of like him, refusing to move to San Francisco and moving the HQ to Hudson Yards. He has turned WF into JP Morgan Jr. with all the Chase hires.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @18m+1k0d2fen6

@mb, What did CS say about teams? That talking about them is "cultish"? Oh, tell me more. This belongs on another post/thread however.....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @n9+1k0d2fen6

When a company says that their people are their advantage, then you start to believe it. When the new CEO comes in a says that their people word “team” sounds cultish, believe it. Chuckie Candor is the reason WF doesn’t believe that their employees are their competitive advantage.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mb+1k0d2fen6

Is this some rejected "After School Special" script?

Not just bad dialogue, but truly pathetic, pedantic and patronizing --- complete academic B=U=L=L=S=H=I=T at its best/worst.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ez+1k0d2fen6

Is this the corporate version of s-xting?!?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d4+1k0d2fen6

Seems you replaced 'therapist' with 'teacher'. Nonetheless, this post is a great perspective.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d1+1k0d2fen6

Excellent post

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ck+1k0d2fen6

Lame A.I.-generated dreck.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1k0d2fen6

Brainwashing

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1k0d2fen6

That teacher sounds like a pretentious dou--e.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1k0d2fen6

Post a reply

: