Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Downstream, chemicals and maybe Upstream execs

As part of D&S, will they downgrade/mandatory retire the numerous low value adding execs? You can probably get 2-3 employees for those in HC10 locations.

Especially downstream and chemicals, why the f--k do you have so many execs?

If you weren't thinking of this DWW already, you have heard it now


by
| 116 views | | 10 replies (last 19 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m57qvvsm

10 replies (most recent on top)

@120 try doing your job without EMIT genius. Really stupid response. Low IQ.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @14n+1m57qvvsm

@bk Downstream and Chemicals (EMPS) actually own and operate assets that make money. EMIT is a never ending money su-k (Polaris).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @120+1m57qvvsm

What they are doing pushing people who can actually do the job out is outrageous. Age discrimination! Blame on DW, KM and NH.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mt+1m57qvvsm

@dp It's not just the retirement eligible tier 2's that are the problem. Just sayin'

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g2+1m57qvvsm

Could say Vantage fits in this . No

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f2+1m57qvvsm

Honestly, the execs are one thing but a lot of tier 2 (cl 28-29) that are retirement eligible are the real problem. Get shuffled around and eat up rank points and don’t actually do anything. Look no further than some of the recent LCS disasters

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dp+1m57qvvsm

Finance is a joke. All the finance leaders spend more time doing coffee chats than actually working. Finance in this company all about who you know. The real talent has been pushed out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bq+1m57qvvsm

@ax

What about Downstream and Chemicals? And IT?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bk+1m57qvvsm

The most egregious waste sits squarely in Finance. Too many parade around as CFOs and senior leaders despite lacking strategic credibility, true commercial experience, and the depth of business acumen required to lead the organization or to drive real impact, all the things Finance 2.0 demands of Staff but most Execs themselves can’t deliver (and quietly acknowledge in their small circles). Many have ridden the backs of their teams, claiming credit for work done by people they’ve either driven out or demoralized, and they're now being exposed for the glaring gaps in their own capabilities - openly questioning how long they can survive in this environment.

Is fascinating to watch Execs who've dropped the hammer on others now being told THEY don't meet expectations... L-M-A-O.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ax+1m57qvvsm

It would be fascinating to see a reorg driven from the ground up instead of top down for a change. I have a large list of "leadership" waste that could be cut for the greater good.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1m57qvvsm

Post a reply

: