If I run Q a) Remove the titles of people : No titles. Everyone is employee....and managers. b) Performance to be evaluated by everyone. You can review everyone and anyone you want. You can write whatever you are writing on this site. The evaluation team will include HR person and technical person from not reporting to that VP. RTP will be reviewed by SD, SD by BDC and so on. c) Evaluation happens once a year. d) Every Manager should have a limit of X no. of reports, director should have Y no. of reports, VPs should have Z no. of reports. e) For every failure...the VP will take a 10% pay cut..if two groups are involved their VPs will share the pay cut. f) Ownership....if one VP takes ownership of project he will be responsible for it...and other VP's who are providing collaterals to him will be accountable to him on the quality of the collaterals...no blame game... if the thing doesn't work the owner VP is responsible. no collective responsibility. g) No repeat of work....one group doing software, hardware... there is one circuit group which reports to RTP, one to BDC , one to SD etc, on to Austin....none of this.....one VP controlling one complete division..
3 replies (most recent on top)
Managers have nothing to fear in the current rating system. They can all CTRL-Z their newly found "niceness". HR exists solely to defend Managers no matter what they do or say.
You can already submit feedback about anyone's performance via Ph. The new performance feedback system was integrated in the second half of last year. Many managers became much 'nicer' to their direct reports for the fear that the system would get flooded with negative feedback with respect to managers' non-performance.
gold