Who had the better and more memorable ads?
9 replies (most recent on top)
The both were effective for their own target audience.
I agree with WKS. Stop with the T-Mobile nonsense, no one cares about your stupid agenda or millenial thinking. Google Alexandria ortiz Cortez or something and quit being an imbecile.
In case you missed it, OP is a tmobile shill who posts on here from time to time, who loves john legere for some reason. Cricket wireless is better than any of the others, tmobile ranks down there with Wal-Mart's house brand for cell phones, sorry shill boy.
Who cares. It’s meaningless.
FloTV, E-Stamp.com, OnMoney.com, OurBeginning.com, JustForFeet, Epidemic.com, LifeMinders.com, Netpliance.com and Pets.com all had expensive SuperBowl ads representing their brands over the years.
Are they household names now?
Does Miller Lite still taste like garbage?
Did Bud win a bunch of new devotees due to recent ads?
I’m not sure there’s a provable ROI for many firms. It seems more about bragging rights.
Ahhhh..No VZ ads. TMO nailed it
I love me job. I have assistant that proof read by work. I dress up and go to events to practice my English. What a great country I make money for having bad accent and look g@y.
Lot of people were buzzing about t-mobile ads
No one saw or heard of VZ ads. Great job marketing Diego !
TMobile ads were popular. Some criticized them for being s-xist
I didn't realize that Verizon ram any ads for the super bowl
I saw plenty of clever t mo ads. Did not notice any VZ ads......