The concept of cause and effect is a little over simplified here. To say the older generations brought stock prices up and the younger ones brought it down is oversimplified. The people at the top of the chain in the boardroom.... Merlo, Ryan, etc., created the system that devalued the long term consistency of employment and opened up an environment of ongoing turnover. So yeah, it’s easy to say newer generations are to blame.
Also, if you think wether or not being good managers is to blame for dropping stock prices....Think again. When the company cuts payroll, they know they are going to take a loss in retail profit... They just hold the carrot of your head and control you through fear to minimize the loss as much as possible. Retail profits will mean less and less. What matters is can they create excitement though all these b---s--- mergers to create a narrative of innovation. Has it worked? Most times... yes. But Those buyouts place the stress and burden on retail and the people at the bottom of the chain. And they make it increasingly harder on them with every merger. Cutting opportunity for us to maximize bonuses while Merlo and co. bonuses Increase to be the highest paid among most ceo’s in the country.
The company profits off not giving a sh-- about you and creating an environment of high turn over so people don’t have time to connect the dots. ...,And they create a progressive image to keep the libtards from interfering with this very plutocratic system.
But it’s fine, let’s turn generations against each other...managers against pharmacist. The company is just doing what all (actually not) companies do. Be greatful you have a job. Bend over and take it..,whatever. Let’s just not blame the company.
Originally posted on another thread by @WDwb02g-wmv