I have spoken to many people who have 30+ years in the company regarding the rumor of a buyout and for them there seems to be a simple consensus. If the offer is capped at 60 weeks it is just not that much more than 1 year's salary. They would rather take their chances they will be able to work more than 1 more year at their current jobs with the high salary. Also knowing that at their age it will take longer to find their next job AND the salary at that next job would not be as high as the current salary. To a person they feel that if the offer is 3 weeks per year with no cap it would make the numbers more likely that they would take the offer. The reason I think the company doesn't just continue to Rif people to reach their target is because they want to target the older workers (who typically make more salary and have more vacation benefits) and with a RIF if you make it too obvious you are targeting the older workers it is more likely the company would be sued. Also in this pro-American political atmosphere, wouldn't be surprised if there is resentment against a large company which just saved billions of dollars in the new tax breaks Rifing American employees who worked loyally for them for decades.
Originally posted by @V9qNMoq-2vve.