Thread regarding Nike Inc. layoffs

Really

Were the men who were let go really the problem? I haven't heard of any s-xual harassment at nike. Why would they be allowed to retire if that was the case?

by
| 2084 views | | 4 replies (last March 28, 2018) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Shl9xY4

4 replies (most recent on top)

Omg. Consider yourself lucky you never experienced or saw it. But trust that TE’s plan was to be CEO not to retire unexpectedly. He’s “allowed” to retire because he didn’t commit the acts directly-just allowed his entire team to be a bunch of self-serving a--holes who treated both men and women like dirt. The way they treated women tho was astonishing. So vulgar and assuming.

TE is not overseeing anyone anymore. He’s “consulting” until August b/c of his contract would be my guess.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8psy+Shl9xY4

abuse of position.

How the hell is TRUMP still in power when just an accusation at Nike...gets people tossed?

Our country is f-ed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2drk+Shl9xY4

It's a pattern. More than just 1 thing. It's using your position to have self serving things happen.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ylv+Shl9xY4

Abuse of power. . .it doesn't have to be s-xual.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nct+Shl9xY4

Post a reply

: