Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

What about selling SPVSS?

by
| 10142 views | | 30 replies (last January 16, 2018) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+R0PmmU6

30 replies (most recent on top)

hope to know the latest news of the deal

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gqws+R0PmmU6

Good post @acjf

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cjce+R0PmmU6

Just be glad if no one buys it. At least people will get the LR package. With a "half-complete products that no-one wants", it just means the acquiring company will unload without any compensation after acquiring the unit(s). No media will report that and no 'LR' in Cisco news. That's the way how the games are played... Silent reduction with no compensation... :)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cgmn+R0PmmU6

You missed:

Fill vacant management positions with people whose recent success was running Seachange into the ground.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bvkf+R0PmmU6

@ @R0PmmU6-acjf... you hit the nail right on the head! Brilliant observation, seriously!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bmrv+R0PmmU6

Since when SPVSS has good sales? - NDS in 2012 had good revenues and profits. You can speculate whether it was worth anything like $5bn, and whether it was about to become a declining business without Cisco's help, but the acquisition did several things to bring about a rapid decline:

  • focus the ex NDS and Cisco management on a fast integration, rather than keeping the business strong

  • axe the new projects that would have been the proving ground for the latest technology and destroy NDS' reputation for delivering on projects, based on a short-term view of the new project revenues.

  • fail to implement a strategy to resolve overlaps and allow ongoing competition over which products should go forward

  • lose all the ex-NDS senior management that understood the business, the market, and had the important relationships with the customers.

  • then focus investment on ideas without any real market traction, forcing a culture shift from highly-customised solutions that the customers wanted to half-complete products that no-one wants.

  • oh, and along the way, keep hacking away steadily at the workforce to make sure that expertise is lost, effort wasted on implementing the workforce reductions and the consequent re-organisations, and that morale is minimised.

I hope for the remaining staff that the buyer(s) has/have a better approach to running a company than Cisco.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @acjf+R0PmmU6

@R0PmmU6-aezf Where were you to advise Chambers when he was blowing the $5bn!

I must admit when I heard on that fateful day back in 2012 that Cisco was buying NDS, the first thing that entered my head was "what here is worth that much money?".

I just couldn't see it - but I wrongly assumed it was my lack of business knowledge.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aoyj+R0PmmU6

A COMCAST purchase would be the kiss of death. Only thing worse would be VERIZON.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @alfp+R0PmmU6

The vanity of it. Apart from smart cards what’s else is there to buy ?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aezf+R0PmmU6

I’d be surprised if it were just one single buyer - what does Comcast want with the satellite tech, or BsB with X1 stuff? It will be sold in parts

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aeun+R0PmmU6

So our rumors include;

  • Rovi/ TiVo

  • Comcast

  • bSkyb

  • status quo

Anything else?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @avzf+R0PmmU6

TiVo / Rovi. And before anyone asks, yes, it affects Lawrenceville

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @axvi+R0PmmU6

Any news???? Who will be the happy company that will get us??

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @axnd+R0PmmU6

So he valued each NDS employee at $1 million dollars - this guy is a business genius!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6aav+R0PmmU6

Chambers US$5,000,000,000 (US$5Billion!) folly! After the purchase closed, Cisco exec's came to 'lead' and left because of failure, while other senior exec's refused to take it on (claimed 'personal time off for family'... Regardless of the enormous funds in Cisco's 'bank' at the time, the felony stupid NDS buy/failure was never addressed head-on by the shareholders or board of directors. Think about it, $5Billion...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5cuh+R0PmmU6

“Revenue decline would of been a lot greater if we weren’t in charge “ . Brilliant spin as it is impossible to prove. Trebles all round

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5ujb+R0PmmU6

The spvss booth at CES will help build hundreds of dolllars of pipeline.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4gel+R0PmmU6

Haven’t you seen the size of the SPVSS pipeline? If we bring in a 1/3 of that , Rodney, we will be trillionaires !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4xcs+R0PmmU6

Since when SPVSS has good sales?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4kwg+R0PmmU6

SPVSS do have some good engineers, and sales folks. Problem is no clue about the future, roadmaps, and vision. devops or ci-cd is not going to convince regulated operators to buy a half cooked product.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3bxo+R0PmmU6

It may not be sold. Depends on how much other software sales are in the SP group.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3tjm+R0PmmU6

112358132134 ...

HAPPY NEW YEAR 2018 ! 🎉 😀

Fibonacci

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qbq+R0PmmU6

Well @R0PmmU6-yco is in contention with that $25 bid.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yny+R0PmmU6

Who will buy us???

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1moe+R0PmmU6

let's hope to get some good news

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yco+R0PmmU6

Will know by mid January.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fco+R0PmmU6

25$

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yco+R0PmmU6

also I don't

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nbu+R0PmmU6

Great idea, I'll start the bidding $10 - and it feels over priced at that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ogm+R0PmmU6

don't know

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rux+R0PmmU6

Post a reply

: