Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Intel Rocks

What a bunch of losers and Intel haters spewing incessant crap on this board. Get a Life guys. Do some thing useful !!!

No mass layoffs, no ACT2, just project pruning that any company will do. Stop the nonsense.

by
| 2100 views | | 15 replies (last July 21, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Om2fOwZ

15 replies (most recent on top)

@Om2fOwZ-1oin Who was the CEO at the time? What was his credentials prior to being CEO, what is that man's legacy? The current CEO won't have one accolade nor ever grace the cover of Time unless as cover story of an idiot who ruined a company.

Now look at the three stooges after that, CRB can be upon reflection getting C. Paul an F as after all he was fired. BK is at F, nothing on his watch has delivered, except for the ACT

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1afg+Om2fOwZ

@xyh Intel did successfully reinvent itself when its memory business was collapsing decades ago. However, the one big invention that enabled this reinvention at the time was the microprocessor.

This time there is no big invention to enable Intel to reinvent itself. R.I.P.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1oin+Om2fOwZ

To the OP ... ummm, there are problems within Intel which didn't exist in the past. I remember the mandatory reading of Andy's Only the Paranoid Survive. I remember making and meeting commitments. I remember Managing at Intel.

In all of these things, the focus was on execution. Crisp, defined, goal-oriented execution.

What we have now are high level management teams which tolerate fuzzy, undefined goals and don't hold anyone's feet to the fire for execution problems. If anything, those with "big ideas" that don't execute are promoted and rewarded over those who actually make and meet commitments.

The entire Intel philosophy has been turned on its head. Instead of Intel Rocks - its Intel is now dumb as a bag of Rocks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lol+Om2fOwZ

Intel was great, yes, I did work there for 5 +yrs and for 4 of them, loved every minute. But as for any good thing, it started to get stupid. Key people began to leave, bad decisions made and things became 'diverse' - for the sake of diversity, rather than for 'people' who are the best. Horrible. Why does it always get like that? It was perfect. I see the venom in these posts but trust me, you are better off somewhere else. The last couple of months at big blue it was like there were no adults in the room - and that's no way to run a company. The economy is better, and a lot more jobs are opening up who cares about a past company.

Intel is too big to fail (but I suppose they said that about the Roman Empire as well).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gdf+Om2fOwZ

Great post, @xyh, hope you don't mind me bumping it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qaa+Om2fOwZ

Project pruning....how is it that HR never gets the sheers?

Maybe we should have more posts regarding unionization, collective bargaining to heed off erroding benefits and sh-- 2% focal.

Take that back to your master, slave

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hsy+Om2fOwZ

@Om2fOwZ-vbd Take a look at Microsoft and Amazon.

Both are lead by visionary CEOs, BK well big said.

To equate layoffs with equality of situation or attrition is indeed myopic reptile level thinking, LOL

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vkm+Om2fOwZ

Intel, senior management all mostly bred and nurtured thru 25 years of monopolistic growth that enabled obscene profits and arrogance of treating customers, partners with the kind of love that is the case study of how not to!

Missed every opportunity to catch the next big wave because of the x86 arrogance. Truely the best example innovator's dilemma. No question they spend hundreds of billion and missed on all of them!

Across the board at the top of every major org at Intel is a close minded leader of old who can't sense or accept the new time and believes in the rosy forecasts and creates more as that is all their respective boss wants to hear. No real confrontation and challenge anymore!

In BKs reigns you have a track record of empty next big things all discarded for late and overpriced attempt at the next big thing. In each cas hey are late, overpaid and taking the wrong approach. BK ain't exactly one who's resume is littered with amazing brilliance, LOL

There are NO examples of a technology company successive reinventing itself. Intel being led by old and closed minded executives and shackled with x86 myopia is destined at best to decline like IBM has over two decades, at worst implode like Nokia and Blackberry. Or get carved up like Motorolla and AMD was. If 10nm slips as every indication suggest to 2019 then second half of 2017 and 2018 will be a great ACT to watch.

The question for the executives and common folk you want to pray and believe the promises for forecasts that have been wrong for the last 10 years!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xyh+Om2fOwZ

OP / @vbd -

You are so right. In fact I am committing today to doing something useful - short selling INTC and using the proceeds to siphon technology and poach skilled talent to technology companies that actually know how to innovate and that treat their people like valued human beings.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @auy+Om2fOwZ

Intel HRs should go back to your fundamentals - don't post a list like VSP/ISP from act that includes people's age on sharepoint without setting any access restriction.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hje+Om2fOwZ

Yes, question - which way are those curves heading?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ipw+Om2fOwZ

HR confirmed Intel rocks. When you're beautiful, people will be jealous and hate you. That's why there are so many haters. Microsoft is laying people off as we speak. Why not complain about that? The average tenure at Amazon is less than 2 years, so people either get forced out or they get fed up and leave on their own. Layoffs happens at every company. They just do it differently and the way Intel's leaders chose to do it recently rubbed many people the wrong way. Don't correlate that to Intel failing in everything it does. At the end of the day, its profit speaks for itself. People still buy Intel stuff because they need it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vbd+Om2fOwZ

Near monopoly of consumer PCs and servers is what has been keeping Intel afloat and allowed spending money on everything stupid. Now that there's starting to be some competition, Intel doesn't have that luxury anymore.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @snd+Om2fOwZ

Continuous layoffs since 2006

Intel lies to its investors and employees

Evil Brian Krzanich has no moral compass and cannot tell good from bad

Terrible executive leadership

Stale stock-price with no significant gains for a long time

Intel is unethical and untrustworthy

Antiquated business practices in both commercial and Fab operations

I could add many dozens of line items to the list.... Intel surely does not rock.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kpa+Om2fOwZ

Just project prunning, just all those hyped projects that the dear himself leader started one-two years ago. Just a lot of careers drown in the toilet, just some more billions burned. Just some more proof of management incompetence.

So you, OP, go and f.. yourself until you'll get pruned too, and come back here on layoffs.com with your "just" after you've just lost your job. OK?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @crl+Om2fOwZ

Post a reply

: