Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

Board Should Replace Chuck with a Tech Savvy CEO

Board should replace Chuck before he drains Cisco's cash with mindless M&A and other bogus initiatives. Cisco is a great company and sad to see how toothless leadership it has at the top at a time when the world is going through technology transition phase.

Here are the failure list of Chuck Robbins: Cloud, Data Analytics, IoT (Jasper can not scale), Hyperconvergence (Springpath is dead).

Now his new gig is APM and think AppDynamics will take him to the next $1B business unit. It has only $100M revenue now and he paid >$3B. Cisco Board and leadership, the VCs in Silicon Valley and Cisco M&A team all are in bed together.

Chuck is akin to Steve Balmer of MS and Mark Hurd of HPE. Those two incompetent leaders did so much damage to the two great companies that they are still trying hard to get back on track. If Chuck continues with such erratic behavior like paying $1.2B for Jasper and $3.5B for App Dynamics, Cisco will be destroyed in a couple of years with such M&As before a Chinese company like Huawei or Lenovo buys them out.

In fact there are three stooges that should let go by the boards. Chuck R from Cisco, Meg W from HPE and Ginni R from IBM. They are failing to save three great american organizations. I think IBM is getting ready to let Ginni R go.

Cisco should get a more tech savvy CEO to do the turn around. I want to see Cisco succeed again at all costs.

by
| 4761 views | | 21 replies (last September 11, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+OP3OkVp

21 replies (most recent on top)

Basically give the tin away and then charge the earth for services, customisation and support.

Look at what it costs to get a Cisco box not under contract recertified so you can get a software update along with the new recurring charges for "service revenue" and you'll see Cisco is right there with them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @opwc+OP3OkVp

@aibb I agree about Huawei - every customer hates being on the hook to them. They complain long and hard about being screwed over at every turn. They put out an RFP and swear to everybody that they want to get from under the yoke. Then, they select Huawei, again.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ayvq+OP3OkVp

They could replace him with a wooden spoon with a face drawn on it. No one would notice.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @agtq+OP3OkVp

@9jor - I take issue with your comment that Huawei will kill Cisco.

I see them facing similar challenges unless the Chinese state props them up in a big way (if they are not doing so already). Their operating model is just not sustainable.

If you've been a Huawei customer you'll know how they operate. Basically give the tin away and then charge the earth for services, customisation and support.

I have worked with more than one company where every box had a bespoke configuration and was almost impossible to manage.

Once the assets are depreciated they will not be buying Huawei again.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aibb+OP3OkVp

Whatever cash John Chambers had accumulated for Cisco, that is the play money for Chuck and Kelly Kramer. They will buy their time till the existing cash runs out by squandering it all on ridiculous acquisitions. Challenge will be for the CEO after Chuck (assuming Cisco exists like HPE, unlikely as Huawei WILL KILL Cisco in 3-4 years and Chuck may be the last known CEO) when h/she looks for cash to turn around.

The board should sit and taker notice and investors should run before it is too late. Welcome to capitalism.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @9jor+OP3OkVp

@OP3OkVp-4lcu: So true. The future upside for Cisco is purely an exercise in financial engineering, with very little through innovation. Cisco is now IBM. That is our future and that is frightening. Same formula/playbook. They are just a few years ahead.

Take a read at their message board on Layoff.com for a look into the crystal ball; quarter after quarter decline, focus on Wall Street/investor dividends, calls for the head of the out-of-touch CEO, continuing offshoring of work to India, Brazil, Poland, etc., constant layoffs and for whomever is left...no salary growth and infighting among the worthless middle-management level.

I have to get outta here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4qjf+OP3OkVp

The reality is that Cisco got commoditized. Its a trend very hard to stop. Old times are gone. Cisco will decline Q by Q. No exceptions. To float, Cisco will pay each time more dividends to investors and less to employees. That is the strategy! Not a good company to be.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4lcu+OP3OkVp

You guys are funny. I can guarantee that is Chuck did go you would moan about his replacement. That's because you are moaners. Those that can, do. Those that can't, moan.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4aje+OP3OkVp

Situation in cisco is too much political was happening inside, managers, directors, vp, spv all doing political each one has own purpose for it , so basically they dont give or deliver correct data about the company and business to ceo, for example , does cisco need more than 3 operating systems?

I don't think so, each operating system need to develop or test by big number of sw engineers , that mostly handle in india, I can predict thousand sw engineers working in 2 or 3 new operating system in india, I'm not sure that will generate billions dollar to cisco. Second it was told by upper management that US will work on new products , actually at same time China and India also working on same new products.

How good is a Cisco ceo will not help the company if too many political still hapenning internally, the only thing cisco need to do due diligence deep internally , and go from there , if cisco do this, I don't thing need more than 10k enginner in India

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3rpl+OP3OkVp

Yeah, you could replace her with a spreadsheet.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rpt+OP3OkVp

OK, so who would the potential candidates be? It's all very well whining about Chuck but you'd better think about what his replacement will do. A 'tech savvy' leader would probably look at much of Cisco's business and say there is no future for X technology, there is a lack of strategy for Y technology and just shut large chunks down with substantial layoffs. My suspicion is that you think a new leader would take you back to the mythical land of milk and honey, think again sunshine.

Of course, the BIG mistake you are making is thinking that CR is actually running the business. You'd be far better looking at options to replace the CFO. Hmm, a tech savvy CFO, now there's an oxymoron.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1htm+OP3OkVp

Agree-

The Board is useless, full of toothless tigers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gdg+OP3OkVp

I like the metaphor of Spark as a used car being sold with the exception that the car doesn't actually exist or go anywhere, it's just the vision of a used car.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1brl+OP3OkVp

Look let's be honest this has nothing to do with individuals it has more to do with technology. Just like the PC industry took a hit when laptops became mainstream so have other technologies been affected when it comes to their perspective industries. When is the last time people went shopping for a hub or modem? Cisco has been cleaning up shop it takes time so yes layoffs are going to keep happening. I know it s---s I was let go a few years ago but the technology I was working on is not around as better products have succeeded it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zum+OP3OkVp

The board would just hire a used car salesman like RT. Just look at Spark and the IoT space

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @adb+OP3OkVp

The cake-to-people ratio is too small ....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @icz+OP3OkVp

Cisco should have a tech CEO? Wow, what a genius thought. Never would have thought of that. Next you’ll be saying a CEO should have ideas of his own and make his own decisions instead of just listening to his minions. He actually admitted he shouldn’t have been CEO - not sure if that’s good or bad.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rfi+OP3OkVp

It's the tech industry...old companies are dying while new companies thrive. As soon as you accept that as a fact it's real easy not to care and treat your job for what it should be, just a job nothing more.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sid+OP3OkVp

You got a better chance of having the campus move to Gilroy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @clk+OP3OkVp

The Cisco Board are incompetent. All cronies of the Chairman.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ecl+OP3OkVp

CR, ELT and the board are in cahoot together.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wod+OP3OkVp

Post a reply

: