There were 2 different severance overviews written for this RIF. The first one included San Diego under WARN. The revised overview did not. I wonder if Oracle reported the data differently in to exploit a loop hole in the WARN ACT ? The San Diego campus was consolidated several years ago to reduce costs. At that time employees were asked to volunteer for WFH (work from home) full time. Did Oracle separate the San Diego WFH employees from the employees who had an assigned office to avoid triggering the WARN act ?
6 replies (most recent on top)
Because the three stooges do everything they can to avoid foling warn notices. A specialty of the house of LE
Only 45 were laid off in San Diego (under the 50 min WARN requirement)
I can't wait till MH lays himself off. The company would save about $55 million dollars.
Cheapest company on earth.
I don't know about WARN laws in California, but from what I understand about WARN here in Colorado, if a company layoff affects 50 or more employees, they must file WARN paperwork.
If they are sneaky, and have multiple smaller layoffs of 49 or fewer employees, they don't need to file WARN paperwork, and can get rid of people under the radar.
WTF, THAT IS CHEAP.