Thread regarding Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) layoffs

Are these numbers real? I just saw this in another post, and my jaw almost dropped... It's related to the number of layoffs since year 2000...

"

By my count it is 160,000 since 2000 when the first "voluntary retirement" was offered.

Carly = 27,000

Hurd = 48,000

Whitman = 85,000

That is basically the entire population of the city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida

"

by
| 1861 views | | 5 replies (last November 15, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+KmHOXub

5 replies (most recent on top)

I was one of the employee that's effected by the "workforce reduction." I don't think Meg Whitman has much visionary as a CEO. Nothing innovative from HPE in comparison to its competitors. In fact its more of a catching up and follow the leaders (Intel, Google and etc). The roadmap itself has no edge over the competitions. Only saving grace it might have are some government contracts it has due to the fact the servers have to be manufactured in the native soil.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rwj+KmHOXub

Did Mark Hurd cut back on R&D engineering as well?

https://www.everipedia.com/Mark_Hurd/

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vvi+KmHOXub

Wow... She is definitively the Queen...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nhv+KmHOXub

Not sure about her predecessors, but the 85K number for Meg does not include spinoffs. ES to CSC alone is moving over 100K staff out of HPE. Those numbers are separate from WFRs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tzi+KmHOXub

I think there's a lot of overlapping there. Meg's ones are even more difficult to define, as I believe they include the spin offs, which are not necessarily layoffs per se. Still... Too many layoff. Multiply each layoff at least by 5, and you can realize the magnitude of all the people impacted in one way or another... So terrible...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @usz+KmHOXub

Post a reply

: