Thread regarding AT&T Inc. layoffs

Profits withour prosperity, Harvard Business Review

This CEO wants adquire a media company? who are we kidding, iwe have not seen any of the promised results from past acquisitions, just layoffs, anfpd small pay increases fir some, this is starting to look like the wave of hostile takeovers that swept the country in the 1980s. Corporate raiders often claimed that the complacent leaders of the targeted companies were failing to maximize returns to shareholders. That criticism prompted boards of directors to try to align the interests of management and shareholders by making stock-based pay a much bigger component of executive compensation.

These practices chipped away at the loyalty and dampened the spending power of American workers, and often gave away key competitive capabilities of U.S. companies. Attracted by the quick financial gains they produced, many executives ignored the long-term effects and kept pursuing them well past the time they could be justified.

by
| 985 views | | 3 replies (last September 21, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Jp7gn7E

3 replies (most recent on top)

Stephenson and Stankey are the WORST. Overpaid while they underpay, outsource, and lay off employees so that they get their big dividend checks. I can only hope and believe in karma for these two despicable human beings.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5wyw+Jp7gn7E

Right on point

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vyp+Jp7gn7E

AT&T used to be an admired company but profits and greed has gotten in the way. Randy should've been fired when the TMo deal went south. Ineffective leadership at the top, how can we expect different down the chain?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1miz+Jp7gn7E

Post a reply

: