Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

Gotta be honest, wasn't LR'ed but have been feeling like sh-- this whole week.

I guess I was one of the "lucky" ones who didn't get LR'ed last week. Lucky because I can still pay for my home and feed my family. However, despite my luck, I have not been comfortable at Cisco this past week at all.

First and foremost, many of my friends, people who gave years to this company, were LR'ed. I know for a fact that these people were hard working as hell and the fact that they were LR'ed is beyond me. There are some who were not LR'ed, perhaps I'm in this group, who definitely deserved to be LR'ed. People who never come in to work or do JUST enough to survive. But like past posters have written, LR isn't about being fair. It's about cutting the fat and leaving the good parts on. The parts that management like. It's probably best to have friends in high places. I've definitely had credit stolen from me before and no matter how much I tried to reason with my manager, the credit was awarded to the person who could kiss the hardest.

I honestly can't say I like working at Cisco anymore. Who can give their all when layoffs are an annual exercise? Why work your a-- off if you're just going to get LR'ed when the higher ups decide to cut fat again? I just don't see the appeal. Maybe it's time I just walk. I wanted to stay at Cisco for as long as I could because of the name but who's going to blame me for wanting to leave? Potential hiring managers? They'd probably agree with me.

Every little thing at work has me paranoid nowadays. Did I screw up? Did I say the wrong thing? Will I get LR'ed next round? This is not good for my mental or physical health.

by
| 3094 views | | 6 replies (last August 29, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+J5zgNhU

6 replies (most recent on top)

worked there years ago...people constantly stole my work and ideas...took documents and put their name on them then distributed to sr. management... Presented my ideas to their management as if their own...

irony is most of these C-players are still there :-)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2wtk+J5zgNhU

@J5zgNhU-dtv - I am not assuming salary=value, but I am asserting that the criteria for being LR'd was heavily (solely?) weighted on the employee's salary, as opposed to their value. So a low-level idiot was more likely to survive than a high-level genius

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eac+J5zgNhU

After surviving multiple LR cycles, I got to a point where I didn't trust management, I didn't believe in the "strategy", and hearing the words "People Deal" made me break out in uncontrollable laughter.

Leaving was the best thing I ever did.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qxx+J5zgNhU

@J5zgNhU-gnd: You are assuming a direct correlation between salary and employee value. Not sure this is always true.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dtv+J5zgNhU

I agree with this, I didn't receive an LR, but I'm not actively looking to leave. How wants to work for such a company

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gku+J5zgNhU

Problem is, it's not "cutting the fat" it's "cutting the costs", so high-salary folks are prime targets, regardless of actual value to the company

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gnd+J5zgNhU

Post a reply

: