Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

Official number is 5,500

by
| 3132 views | | 13 replies (last August 18, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+IV5GPqh

13 replies (most recent on top)

By this time next year it will be 20%. Anyone want to bet?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xts+IV5GPqh

Cisco rumors are always true but only for that specific moment. There must have been a time the number of 14,000 was discussed. Don't be too happy too early. There will be silent LR's and "performance management" to make up the difference, so the true number will be for sure more than 5500.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yve+IV5GPqh

Cisco rumors are always true but only for that specific moment. There must have been a time the number of 1,400 was discussed. Don't be too happy too early. There will be silent LR's and "performance management" to make up the difference, so the true number will be for sure more than 5500.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1muq+IV5GPqh

Sh-- Indian journalism at center just like coders at Cisco

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cle+IV5GPqh

s--- it. Its 20% http://www.reuters.com/article/us-cisco-systems-layoffs-idUSKCN10S05D

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @utf+IV5GPqh

14,000 - 5,500 = 8,500 folks have been saved. Yipppie!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dsf+IV5GPqh

7% is a BS I guess they are not factoring all the silent layoffs that happened this past quarters.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yrg+IV5GPqh

Yeah, nice reporting CRN. Wondering who the "multiple sources" were!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gtx+IV5GPqh

Probably floated a 20% rumor so that 7% is easier to swallow. Still s---s.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qpq+IV5GPqh

Yes 5500 that's only ~27,000 in the last 8 years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dbf+IV5GPqh

CRN should be taken to task for the aburd numbers. Aweful job CRN....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lcl+IV5GPqh

http://investor.cisco.com/investor-relations/news-and-events/news/news-details/2016/Cisco-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Fiscal-Year-2016-Earnings/default.aspx

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mms+IV5GPqh

7% of workforce -- just shows how stupid all those rumors were. . .

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pkk+IV5GPqh

Post a reply

: