Thread regarding Follett layoffs

More BIG layoffs coming and a don't worry everything is under control spin on it . What a joke it has become in such a short time .

by
| 2251 views | | 15 replies (last March 3, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+GbXJmOy

15 replies (most recent on top)

Goal = Outsource IT

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3tyz+GbXJmOy

HT WAS the man, Fast forward 10 years - he's been surpassed by his protege, all his VP cronies are gone, all the store managers and directors he hand picked are gone.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3vvr+GbXJmOy

Goal = Outsoure

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2rdh+GbXJmOy

Don't believe it. They have a few more reductions likely in other benefits but no more people. Everytime they layoff employees, it PERMANENTLY damages employee morale and productivity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2mcy+GbXJmOy

Wave one and then a wave two. The Ides is always a preferred time before the beginning of the new fiscal.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1edc+GbXJmOy

"...can only succeed through its employees". Not much success lately. Lots of layoffs over the past 30 months, too. Hmmm, a correlation perhaps?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mub+GbXJmOy

Beware the Ides of March

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ahe+GbXJmOy

They are done until after Fall rush. See how the results are and then take necessary action to keep expenses inline with revenue. It is important to start the new year without new reductions. Follett can only succeed through its employees.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nmw+GbXJmOy

What timeline are they looking at for these so-called big layoffs? If you can't say, don't tease.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1uhe+GbXJmOy

Why do you hate HT so much? When I worked at Follett he was the man.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1egh+GbXJmOy

HT needed to be gone 10 years ago

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bbd+GbXJmOy

I would suggest starting with a guy known as HT

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jmn+GbXJmOy

don't feed the trolls...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bcp+GbXJmOy

this info is based on what?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qed+GbXJmOy

When?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @axs+GbXJmOy

Post a reply

: