Thread regarding SAP layoffs

Whistleblower

Has anyone here had experience with whistleblowing? Do the they take it seriously? Any backlash stories?

by
| 1941 views | | 11 replies (last December 10, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1v9F8vqR

11 replies (most recent on top)

it depends. I reported a bully case of a people manager and the conclusion is that it is not a bully case but SAP doesn't accept it. However, the top manager said "we should not punish people and we should agree on disagree"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @Lept+1v9F8vqR

depends on the issue. for me, I reported someone for as--ult and was told, one time is an error and not punishable. it's still says that in the employee handbook.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @Lirh+1v9F8vqR

Juergen Mueller was not let go because of a whistleblower, he was let go because his offense was in public and other people saw it. had nobody seen it, he would still be going along business as usual. we know this because it was not his first offense, just the first in public.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @Lxyn+1v9F8vqR

I was retaliated against. 0.0% merit increase, the only goose egg in my team. Filed a report with ethics & compliance & participated in resultant interviews. Then never heard a word except that they laid off investigators and that in the 4Q of every year, the backlog skyrocketed so “be patient”. I changed teams for a very good final year then accepted the VERP in April. A lot depends on how “wild Wild West” your market unit is tolerated to be. Be careful and have an exit strategy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4uzz+1v9F8vqR

How it would backlash? especially if anonymous

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1aqn+1v9F8vqR

Be very wary. Doing this opens the door to reverse review by auditors that have way too much power.

The review team that handle your case have full autonomy over your scenario. If for whatever reason they find you to be the cause of the issue, you are then under review.

You are at the mercy of both their ability to understand and empathize in your favor.

They are a very weak team.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cxn+1v9F8vqR

The tool cost Juergen Mueller his job, so it can be powerful.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1blv+1v9F8vqR

Try your luck here -

https://app.convercent.com/en-us/LandingPage/c11fcf9e-a052-ea11-a972-000d3ab9f062?_=1616097379987

It will get answered by the compliance team but they will ask you to disclose your identity to understand the context, case and will seek tangible evidences.

No guarantee that they will act on it and no guarantee that it could get leaked back to your people manager. It happened in some instances. But that’s another story.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rdz+1v9F8vqR

the perception of even a small hint of backlash is so discouraging for the employee and also for the reputation of teh company... That tells the trust lost between the company and the employees if this is a common view. (we dont know)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nmw+1v9F8vqR

Be careful. People who did as much as be involved in the SVB elections as electors are being audited by Compliance right now. Just because they belong to a true Union,not a yellow one.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rza+1v9F8vqR

Yes and the backlash depends on how much you are willing to disclose your identity and how much the company wants to hide the matter.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jbv+1v9F8vqR

Post a reply

: