Corporations serving only the top and shareholders is not a sustainable arrangement within the framework of any society. Maybe in a lab. They exist in communities, draw resources from said communities, and enjoy low taxation, legal protection of the US, and other advantages communities provide, and yet they treat communities like garbage, workforce and clients alike. How about they move elsewhere altogether, and see how it will work out for them there? And no, I am not grateful for having a job under such an arrangement.
9 replies (most recent on top)
They will su-k the te-t dry before anything changes. Just saying.
You are absolutely correct. I just don't know how to fix it before our economy and culture are destroyed.
One word - unsustainable. Good luck middle and lower classes.
lol that the schizo libertarian keeps coming back to upvote that weirda$$ comment
@fxo+1uXCH8O4 Ditto well said. In the meantime, people who have wealth, and investments, will listen to the pied pipers talking about "soft landings", inflation targets have been met, and inflation has ended, and deficits don't matter, and dollar standard doesn't matter, and Wells Fargo asset cap will end and whatever. The banks are going after investment income and not loan deposits. This will work until it doesn't.
It’s welfare for the college educated. Look how many d-mb people work here including higher levels of leadership.
Well said.
Wealth inequality will destroy either the country, or the billionaire class. It hasn't been this extreme since the 1920's and we all know how that worked out.
Super enlightened…