Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

CWA District 9 and AT&T believed to have Inked Controversial Agreement Allowing Job Cuts and Contractor Replacements

CWA District 9 and AT&T believed to have Inked Controversial Agreement Allowing Job Cuts and Contractor Replacements

In a significant and controversial development, the Communications Workers of America (CWA) District 9 has finalized an agreement with AT&T Inc. that will allow the company to cut a portion of its workforce and replace those positions with contracted labor. This deal comes as AT&T continues to navigate the challenges of a rapidly evolving telecommunications industry, where cost-cutting measures are becoming increasingly common.

### Key Provisions of the Agreement

Under the terms of the agreement, AT&T is permitted to eliminate certain full-time positions across various departments within District 9, which covers California and parts of Nevada. These roles will be filled by contractors, who are expected to provide similar services at a lower cost. The exact number of jobs affected has not been disclosed, but sources within the company suggest that it could impact several hundred workers.

### Union's Perspective

CWA District 9 leadership acknowledged that the decision to agree to these terms was not made lightly. In a statement, CWA District 9 representatives said, "This was a difficult but necessary decision given the economic pressures facing our members and the industry at large. Our priority has always been to protect our members' rights and secure the best possible outcomes under challenging circumstances."

The union has secured several concessions from AT&T, including enhanced severance packages for affected employees, job placement assistance, and retraining programs to help displaced workers transition to new roles either within AT&T or in other industries.

### AT&T’s Response

AT&T has defended the agreement, emphasizing that the move is essential for the company to remain competitive. "In an industry as dynamic as telecommunications, we must continually adapt our workforce to meet the needs of our customers and our business," said an AT&T spokesperson. "This agreement allows us to do that while still providing support for our employees who will be impacted."

### Mixed Reactions from Workers and Industry Experts

The agreement has sparked mixed reactions among CWA members and industry observers. Some union members have expressed disappointment, feeling that the union has conceded too much in negotiations. "We understand the need for the company to stay competitive, but we fear this sets a dangerous precedent for future negotiations," said one anonymous worker.

Industry experts, however, note that the use of contractors is a growing trend in many sectors, particularly in technology and telecommunications. "This is part of a broader shift we're seeing across industries as companies look to reduce costs and increase flexibility,"

### Looking Ahead

As the agreement goes into effect, both CWA District 9 and AT&T will be closely monitored by labor groups and industry analysts alike. The outcome of this deal could have implications not only for the thousands of workers affected but also for future labor negotiations in the telecommunications industry.

by
| 2041 views | | 22 replies (last August 23, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1u70wCnQ

22 replies (most recent on top)

Voted No on TA

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ahf+1u70wCnQ

So so agreement if the cost of living goes
down. COLA has gone up 16% in the last 2 1/2 years. Good luck. Keep paying those dues. Gotta get those libs elected !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ywz+1u70wCnQ

Yawn!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1klf+1u70wCnQ

“ Not fake…. if you let this happen it’s the beginning of the end of a union job with AT&T”

It’s been happening with regularity for the past 5 years. There is no stopping or slowing this trend.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @isi+1u70wCnQ

Source citation- Tentative agreement found on District 9 website.

  1. Stop movement of work-did not achieve.
  2. Eliminate Subcontracting- did not achieve.
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fen+1u70wCnQ

The union is only interested in keeping their own jobs as union officers and to he\ with their memberships.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jvn+1u70wCnQ

Source citation?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ers+1u70wCnQ

"Unless the replacement workers paid union dues and that’s all that matters to District 9"
Amen Brother. Dues are all that matter to any Union

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @awi+1u70wCnQ

Well, guess that’s that. Welcome to the real world. Hope I can at least get my house paid off and my kids through high school.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ate+1u70wCnQ

Stankey is fully capable in making this reality.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bkn+1u70wCnQ

Cwa once again proving their worthlessness.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rlq+1u70wCnQ

Not fake…. if you let this happen it’s the beginning of the end of a union job with AT&T

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lwo+1u70wCnQ

https://cwa9415.org/system/files/2024-08/att_final_report.pdf

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jdj+1u70wCnQ

District 9 represents the current members and would not agree to replace them with contractors. Unless the replacement workers paid union dues and that’s all that matters to District 9.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bfv+1u70wCnQ

If the union agreed to this, then shame on them!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pku+1u70wCnQ

AI

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jvi+1u70wCnQ

Totally fake

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qgu+1u70wCnQ

Is MasTec already doing Mobility work?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zuh+1u70wCnQ

AI content?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @idd+1u70wCnQ

prime rumor all over again lmao

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oay+1u70wCnQ

Crazy someone took the time to make all this up.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vbk+1u70wCnQ

Fake news, get a life loser

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ijp+1u70wCnQ

Post a reply

: