Thread regarding Nike Inc. layoffs

Nike culture

Nike has a culture problem, and it’s been festering for years, well before JD took the helm. This isn’t just a blip; it’s a systemic issue. The upper echelons of management are a cesspool of nepotism and cronyism, propped up by an old boys' and girls' network. Let’s debunk a major myth right now: JD wasn’t an outside hire. He’s been embedded in Nike’s DNA since the mid-'90s, either as a consultant or board member, perpetuating the very culture that’s now under fire.

The next CEO needs to be a young, dynamic outsider who’s as passionate about sports and athletes as Nike’s founders were. This person must be committed to cultivating in-house talent and dismantling the entrenched gatekeepers who’ve long dominated the company’s upper ranks. It’s time to clear out the spouses who are merely career cheerleaders for each other, the nepo babies, and the talismanic execs who serve no real purpose.

We need a culture built on meritocracy and risk-taking, not one that’s merely chasing the latest trends.

But let’s be real: this is all wishful thinking. This is Phil Knight’s company, and every CEO has been his handpicked successor. He’s notoriously reluctant to relinquish any semblance of power to anyone outside his inner circle.

by
| 1421 views | | 9 replies (last July 3, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1tjZNY4U

9 replies (most recent on top)

"A company at Nike’s size should have had controls in place to check power and influence but it doesn’t. One of the reasons for this is the insularity of leadership here."

or more simply, some people want more money and power (greed) and they believe that they can get away with it
sadly like a cancer, the effects are felt in the long term

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jet+1tjZNY4U

Ah, nepotism and spousal career support, the dynamic duo. Our illustrious CMO is batting a thousand in both categories. And let’s not forget her starring role as the “co-founder” of a minority-owned agency—yeah, she’s as white as a 2016 Trump rally*. Funny how her bio conveniently skips over the fact that she’s got more connections to Nike than an octopus has tentacles.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lrv+1tjZNY4U

nepotism: yes see the tuskis, MF's brother in law in strategy.

sycophants: the new CTO, HON and her crew

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fhy+1tjZNY4U

I worked on a few projects with these passionate and very talented folks in innovation. They’d been at the company for years and doing the jobs of literally absent managers/leadership. When a promotion opportunity finally opened up, they were passed over and director hired his friend from outside who was completely unproven and had no product sense. People ended up quitting and it’s been net negative since. Pretty common story throughout innovation unfortunately.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @byo+1tjZNY4U

Nike culture : Promote based on relationships, if your spouse is a Sr Dir, you are qualified no matter what!, reward those who look the part! And do not forget the 2-hr lunch planners! That is all!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dgl+1tjZNY4U

@ijp+1tjZNY4U I have to disagree with you there. A company at Nike’s size should have had controls in place to check power and influence but it doesn’t. One of the reasons for this is the insularity of leadership here. When talented people come in thinking they are in the inner circle, they quickly learn that there is a circle within that circle. The realization comes in the form of stalled promotions, unrequested transfers or seeing layers being added above you diminishing your authority.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nlf+1tjZNY4U

Anytime a company gets as big as Nike and there’s a lot of money to be made, you will get grifters. They infect the organization and bring in their sycophants to protect them. It’s like a cancer.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ijp+1tjZNY4U

A new CEO isn’t going to fix the toxic work environment. There is so much ego from ELT down to Director level, it’s a wonder anything gets decided and done. The ego seems to drive decisions and processe. The current system and culture is never going to get us “closer to market”.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ebe+1tjZNY4U

This is correct but I would say that JD has been crawling up PKs a$$ for years. He never understood Nike. He was simply a millionaire kissing a billionaire’s ring.
PK then put him on the board of swoosh and on the board of Nike. The old man loved how much JD kissed his a$$, he made him CEO. A mistake which cost him billions!

Rich old man conned by flattering a$$ kisser is a story as old as time!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @alo+1tjZNY4U

Post a reply

: