Last few years at Nike have seen extreme behaviors like bullying (folks colluding to defame teammates that are not like themselves, spreading gossip to push them out, using abusive language). Despite exhibiting these behaviors, some folks got into Director /Sr Director/Distinguished roles and now deciding the fate of others! Under past GT leadership friends promoted each other into Sr roles so they keep quiet on sloppy contracts. HR seems to be supporting these behaviors by ignoring complaints and not following competitive hiring/promotion practices! They should really look at all those promotions and evaluate if there were genuine contributions that led to the promotion. There was more respect to Sr director role in the past - most of them managed multiple teams of 100s of people, now everyone with a half dozen reports is a sr director despite lack of experience & effort.
5 replies (most recent on top)
toxic people in techps ehq
You talking about Techops EMEA? Sure sounds like it
You want a SD to manage 100’s of people? What are you in 1920’s?
Yes. This is Nike Resilience at its best. This post will likely be deleted.
MM would never look into this . No spine to investigate her peers.
Everyone knows favoritism and neoptism rampant in HON and MG orgs ….