In 2020/21, GT went through a hiring frenzy and accumulated significant number of TPM Sr.D, D, ICs positions from across GT. Domains and new hires (mostly remote). This strategy did not work as expected, as TPM never got recognized by its peer verticals in GT and its business partners. Always a 3rd wheel. On top of this mess, Nike business continued to hire and build their own individual business product management positions, leading to duplication of roles and responsibilities - leading to territorial war. There is also GEO tech TPMs, another layer of position duplication.
Also what didn’t work for tpm org was the ideology of not building domain expertise instead spent hours and days on Artifacts, AHA, PME,NPS, product management general training, toxic high-fives, COE Practices etc. in the long run TPM, did not establish a “real” working relationship with business nor engg.
There may be small pockets of useful contributors of product managers (true SMEs, testers and analysts)in this org but majority of them are not and got swayed by the direction given by their TPM leadership/Sr.D and spent valuable time chasing product management COE kool-aid. It’s insane the amount of leadership hierarchy created within this single ORG.
What’s your opinion on GT-TPM org
- - should it stay as it’s own vertical- meaning do nothing?
- - gut the entire org?
- - choose a few valuable contributors and move them to their domain vertical and gut the rest?
I don’t mean to be blunt but I wanted to know what others think about this TPM org, which is densely populated with Sr.D, D and individual contributors.