Thread regarding Nike Inc. layoffs

Still no Oregon WARN notice

Does that mean the first round of layoffs was less than 500 people?

by
| 2371 views | | 10 replies (last March 18, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1rsSaue9

10 replies (most recent on top)

Yep! I heard phase 1
Was only around 480 people.. so probably skipping over the whole WARN notice. eyeroll

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @9sij+1rsSaue9

Technically, nobody is "off the payroll" yet, so the beancounters and lawyers are gaming the system. Everyone given "notice" is being paid normally through May 3.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2nar+1rsSaue9

29 U.S. Code § 2104

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1meo+1rsSaue9

@1wxg+1rsSaue9
Can you link the text of the law that shows Nike doesn't have to file a WARN notice because it gave 69 days notice to employees it laid off?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1oah+1rsSaue9

Read the law. 69 days negated the need for warn

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wxg+1rsSaue9

A covered employer must give notice if there is a mass layoff, which does not result from a business closing, but will result in an employment loss at the employment site during any 30-day period for 500 or more employees, or for 50-499 employees if they make up at least 33 percent of the employer’s active workforce.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uzf+1rsSaue9

I don't think giving people notice and keeping them on payroll for 60 days negates Nike's obligation to file a warn notice.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uvn+1rsSaue9

Why does WARN matter? How would Nike benefit from trying to avoid it?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ikr+1rsSaue9

By giving each person laid off their own, personal 60-day "Notice period", a mass WARN notice was no longer required. A loophole was exploited.

So, don't expect a massive WARN notice for Phase 2 layoffs either. The personal notice periods helps Nike to keep the actual figures more if a mystery.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @asx+1rsSaue9

They are likely going in waves of 499 to avoid warn, hence the multiple rounds

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zco+1rsSaue9

Post a reply

: