I understand the need to justify real estate to improve efficiency, and that drives location strategy in some circumstances. Makes sense.
This approach feels a lot more like “we are still going to have most of all this real estate but are going to limit which employees can use it” rather than “we’re moving employees so that we can sell the building”. Where’s the efficiency in that if you have to pay severances and relocation packages, plus try to hire people to replace institutional knowledge?
I predict that the majority of those affected will take severance rather than move give the volatile state of affairs at “the firm”.