I've been having this sneaking suspicion that those that are going to be closing out TDA are likely going to be the ones, out of the alleged small percent of employees that were on top of the inverse pyramid that keeps getting mentioned by Schwab, as the ones that will be laid off.
Based on the reports and feedback from others, it sounds like the number of employees they expected to leave was about average, and their goal is to cut costs of 500M, real estate approximately accounts for only 50-75M of that while the rest is salary. With the lower level workers getting churned out, which is normal for many companies, I doubt their salaries put a dent into the number. Which leave management, EC, etc. left to churn out as the layoffs loom.
Am I incorrect in drawing this conclusion? I've seen this happen in layoffs before, though it wasn't to me directly. This just seems like the direction they are headed and would make the most sense. By the time the last transition date hits in Q1 2024, they would have a better sense of whether or not they would need those coming in, since they would have been running as per normal already by then with the personnel they have already at Schwab and those that they have brought it already via the transitions of employees.
Personally, I'm probably in the minority when I say this, but I don't mind the idea of getting laid off. So long as they give me the severance that they offer, etc, I actually would benefit from the lay off.