Thread regarding CVS layoffs

Forbidden to endorse colleagues on Linked in

Managers were recently told NOT to endorse colleagues on Linked in. They can privately give a verbal recommendation. Some folks already did so some of us have great recommendations. But as of today they are not supposed to endorse.

by
| 1461 views | | 11 replies (last September 14, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1ozt2HJ6

11 replies (most recent on top)

Is what it is… says everything about the effort you’d put into it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ouo+1ozt2HJ6

I was contacted to give a former colleague who reported to me a job recommendation, my VP advised I cannot do that only provide dates they worked. Is what it is.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ilp+1ozt2HJ6

Those laid off in Q1&Q2 suspected this edict issue as former colleagues/teammates have been silent, a couple of brave people liking LinkedIn posts and providing recommendations but otherwise radio silence

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fwr+1ozt2HJ6

Legal

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ary+1ozt2HJ6

I'd be very curious to find out who created that order.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yxv+1ozt2HJ6

The why is optics for CVS and its insufferable self-interest. They likely fear someone leveraging a recommendation in a lawsuit against their layoff. If they paid half as much attention to treating workers well in the first place it would not be an issue. Likely bleeding talent at this point from its self-inflicted wounds.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jmd+1ozt2HJ6

CVS = CYA.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xew+1ozt2HJ6

I do not understand the why? WHY? What purpose does it serve?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dfm+1ozt2HJ6

Why would anyone want to stay at this pathetic company

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aja+1ozt2HJ6

Now ask yourself why this edict was issued and if it’s a condition of employment or a strong arm intimidation tactic.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jad+1ozt2HJ6

But Why?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wcf+1ozt2HJ6

Post a reply

: