Thread regarding CVS layoffs

The Failure of Laying People off - a finance perspective

Firstly, I was impacted by the layoff. I have over a decade of experience in corporate finance and have analyzed every aspect of the P&L in that time. At CVS one part of my role was expense analysis for my area.

Laying people off is the worst failure. Why?

Any good finance person would know that there are multiple levers to pull on the expense side to save money. The expense side of the P&L is the most important side of the P&L for that specific reason: it’s really the only side a finance person can impact. Finance people can’t impact sales or revenue: that’s entirely dependent on the sales team. My CVS boss was a CFO level and didn’t even understand this basic concept, which was very sad.

Now, what could have been done?

Supplier/Vendor management: analyze all vendors by cost, switch over to more affordable vendors that provide the same thing when possible. Also, cut vendors that aren’t critical. This process, if done correctly, would probably have saved the $500M alone across the company.

Travel freeze: no travel allowed except for sales people and some executives.

Real estate management: sell off some real estate that is no longer being used, or sell expensive buildings and switch to cheaper leases in the same area.

Capital expenditure management: cut in all areas unless business critical

Accrual management: release all accounting accruals that are no longer needed or not critical.

I could go on but don’t want to bore people. So, why did they eliminate people instead of doing the above? Laziness and time.

Getting rid of people is easiest and fastest. But it isn’t the best thing for a company. It’s actually the worst.

However, the rich people padding their pockets in the company don’t really care about that. All about the now for them. Even if it means destroying the company in the future.

by
| 2282 views | | 11 replies (last August 20, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1ob3Ybbi

11 replies (most recent on top)

Unfortunately there were over 500+ of us that were eliminated in Q1&2 and for some reason it was all hush hush-there was no media attention and seems current colleagues had no idea!
Former teammates and colleagues that knew have kept their distance, interestingly, leadership have even gone so far as to block/disconnect from those eliminated -SMH!
It is great to see current colleagues rallying around the current laid off colleagues, and not being afraid to show support

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jfo+1ob3Ybbi

Reorg info being relayed to everyone this week . Stay tuned to find out who you will be working for and what your new job and job duties will be. Hold on, it's going to be rough they're dismantling everything then piecing it back together using spare parts.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xse+1ob3Ybbi

I was going to buy back at $65, but on Saturday morning, Morningstar lowered their FVE (fair value estimate) by $10 a share.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1okw+1ob3Ybbi

Some mo--n talking head went on CNBC and said bail on CVS sell at a loss because Mark Cuban is going to dismantle the company and Walgreens. As for the CEO stepping down, the company will go bankrupt at this point.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1aix+1ob3Ybbi

I know for a fact that because of the upheaval, people traveled to RI this week to plan for reorg. I’m 100% sure it was not out of pocket. Keeping both Slack and Teams is another example of money being wasted. There are many other examples. I’m sure this would not have saved us 500MM in long term but the pain could have been reduced. Disappointed in leadership.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hfp+1ob3Ybbi

Excellent post! I love how your outlined everything. I am sorry to hear you got laid off. I do not work for CVS but have a family member impacted. There is a lucky company out there that will scoop you up!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vws+1ob3Ybbi

The layoff and announcement was a calculated effort to appease shareholders. I am thinking the next appeasement may be the CEO stepping down.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xsv+1ob3Ybbi

But the layoffs are are about complete redirection of the company. Will this company even be in the pharmacy business at all in a year or two? i doubt it. She's wanting to go into primary care and home care hard core. That's the new direction.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qcs+1ob3Ybbi

Agree with the post. In the past, the executives would have sent out an email saying "no travel through the EOY, no ordering supplies, etc. to avoid laying off people, we need everyone to pause (even reducing lights & HVAC before 7am and after 6pm. At one point, VP's and above took a 10% pay cut too...and guess what, when those things were implemented, no layoffs. When employees are aware of the dire need, they will rally. Builds community/culture v.s ripping it apart. Be part of the solution. I think if Karen had announced 1/2Q, folks, we are going to have to lay off X-X unless we do the following - people would have rallied. Of my 10-12 years, I saw this several times (2011, 2012 in particular). Very sad the executives didn't implement alternatives to prevent this or communicate sooner we need to pause on travel, etc for a few months to avoid mass layoffs. This is what I need employees to do and let us be part of the solution. Just my 2 cents.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zgb+1ob3Ybbi

“Accrual management: release all accounting accruals that are no longer needed or not critical.”

You have specific examples because that’s what should be done every month unless you’re sandbagging

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ngf+1ob3Ybbi

Great post perhaps one of the best on the boards. However, Karen's email did mention they were eliminating travel, letting go of contractors and downsizing vendors. I am no where near the P&L but some of the things you mentioned above according to Karen's email were part of the consideration; of course I have know way of knowing how those pieces are being executed or planned.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yun+1ob3Ybbi

Post a reply

: