I would have said much lower, but Glassdoor started in 2007, so I’m guessing this figure goes back to include Stumpf (for 9 years pre-scandal), Sloan and Parker.
Glassdoor should start with fresh data once a new CEO comes on board.. Or better yet, separate the data to show separate ratings for under each CEO, which would reveal more accurate and helpful information and trends.
Having said that - there are still ratings out there recently from employees who purportedly rate Wells Fargo overall a 5. Who are they, where do they work and how long have they worked here? Do people typically go on Glassdoor when they are first starting here, or when they are leaving?
At the very best, I would give Wells an overall rating of 2.5 = AVERAGE. (It would have been
closer to the 3.7 pre- Charlie.) Some good, some bad. It’s only that high because I have a great manager who tries as best he can to protect us from the bs, and great teammates.
I would rate Charlie below 0 if I could. I guess I have been fortunate, before now, to have never worked for a CEO who openly declared war on his own employees.
Thoughts?