0%? 50%? 99%?
Does vegas have a position?
We’ve gone through 10 iterations of bringing in people outside the bank. Pulling in people from the same banks over and over. We’re at a point where we are kicking these leaders out just a few years later.
Now mostly hiring outside again. People hired in 2 years, 3 years, 4 hours ago are now old news. You’re now up for replacement.
If it was going to happen, it would have been after the housing crisis, or when the fake account scam came out.
Banks own politicians and corporate owned media counts on their advertising dollars.
So your congressperson and your nightly news are not going to help.
@rfp+1n9ukcL8 Why is she/he worthless?
There are too many banks. Consolidation.
We're a great source of brib...uhh... campaign contributions. So no, we aren't getting broken up any time soon.
What's the odds something is done about our corrupt gov't, that's what i want to know. I want to know why the SF Fed wasn't watching some other players like SVB and First Republic and dozens of others, or why their poor decisions on not using MTM aren't questioned. I'm all for breaking up and getting to the bottom of our corrupt gov't.
They need to break us up, but crony capitalism will ensure that the worst we see is endless slaps on the wrist
Can we export our useless Head of Technology to one of the other banks?
What big banks are left if they break up?
Somewhere between 0% and 0%.
Regulators need a punching bag to look like they are doing their job.