Thread regarding Capital One layoffs

cheap necklace

Been at capone for 4 years now. Everything under Rob A. the CIO is a disaster this SofaB should have been fired years ago he is an incompetent country bumpkin. I had trained my older white male boss who was hired by nepotism. Apparently his friend who recommended him were both worked a tech company and everyone was fired for misconduct and corruption. So this d-mb white boss I trained and mentored is openly stealing credit for all my work and has gotten a promotion, SPOT awards, and recently a tech x winner award for a project I drove cradle to grave. He purposely downgraded my review to “inconsistent” while downplaying my hard work as belonging. I gave a nasty response in my review telling him I was the one who did all the work and his performance calibration was biased and I am a protected class. He go so scared of getting sued he never followed up about my coaching plan and no PIP. I’ve already obtained an employment lawyer who knows my case and can capone lawyers a demand letter for money owned to me for harassment and discrimination. They got scared of me.
One time I can home and in the lobby was package on the floor that was sent to me. I opened it in the kitchen and it was a “cheap necklace” made of a cheap ribbon and cheap metal. I threw it away into the Kitchen garbage can it was so offensive. I’m writing my autobiography and I’ll include one chapter at Capone. The name of my autobiography will be “cheap necklace” and so will be the name of major motion picture of my life story.

On another note, it is now illegal for companies to make you sign a NDA on condition of receiving severance. So they can’t put that in their NDA agreements anymore to not disparage the company. SO GO TALK THE PRESS FREELY WITHOUT FEAR OF REPRISAL.

https://www.nlrb.gov/news-outreach/news-story/board-rules-that-employers-may-not-offer-severance-agreements-requiring

Board Rules that Employers May Not Offer Severance Agreements Requiring Employees to Broadly Waive Labor Law Rights

Office of Public Affairs
202-273-1991
publicinfo@nlrb.gov
www.nlrb.gov
February 21, 2023

Today, the Board issued a decision in McLaren Macomb, returning to longstanding precedent holding that employers may not offer employees severance agreements that require employees to broadly waive their rights under the National Labor Relations Act. The decision involved severance agreements offered to furloughed employees that prohibited them from making statements that could disparage the employer and from disclosing the terms of the agreement itself.
The decision reverses the previous Board’s decisions in Baylor University Medical Center and IGT d/b/a International Game Technology, issued in 2020, which abandoned prior precedent in finding that offering similar severance agreements to employees was not unlawful, by itself.
Today’s decision, in contrast, explains that simply offering employees a severance agreement that requires them to broadly give up their rights under Section 7 of the Act violates Section 8(a)(1) of the Act. The Board observed that the employer’s offer is itself an attempt to deter employees from exercising their statutory rights, at a time when employees may feel they must give up their rights in order to get the benefits provided in the agreement.
“It’s long been understood by the Board and the courts that employers cannot ask individual employees to choose between receiving benefits and exercising their rights under the National Labor Relations Act. Today’s decision upholds this important principle and restores longstanding precedent,” said Chairman Lauren McFerran.
Members Wilcox and Prouty joined Chairman McFerran in issuing the decision. Member Kaplan dissented.
Established in 1935, the National Labor Relations Board is an independent federal agency that protects employees from unfair labor practices and protects the right of private sector employees to join together, with or without a union, to improve wages, benefits and working conditions. The NLRB conducts hundreds of workplace elections and investigates thousands of unfair labor practice charges each year.

by
| 3591 views | | 17 replies (last July 1, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1n9FsCHp

17 replies (most recent on top)

As a former UM I can confirm Capital One 100% allows racism, specifically black employees falsely accusing white leaders when they are performance managed for their sh---y metrics or system manipulation. The wokeness of Capital One is beyond disgusting. So glad I left that he-l hole

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fhns+1n9FsCHp

Management are all SoaBs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cmig+1n9FsCHp

I think this is a troll post. Anyways, good
luck suing Cap One. First you have to go through the EEOC process. Cap One will retain outside counsel who likely graduated top of his class at some Ivy League law school. They will then drag this out for years to see if you’re serious and willing to front tens of thousands in legal expenses. If you do play the long game, you have to prove harm, financial harm and be able to articulate a dollar amount (and it won’t be millions). Lastly, I was told that Virginia Federal judges are very friendly to large corporations. Your best bet would be to find someone willing to file a class action lawsuit with the backing of the AARP or NAACP or some other NGO who would also pony up a lawyer.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3zxe+1n9FsCHp

The caudacity! Dang honkies.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ush+1n9FsCHp

"The only racist incompetent people are the white men I see around me" This is great. Single out a behavior and apply it to a race and gender.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1btm+1n9FsCHp

The only racist incompetent people are the white men I see around me. So many of them are unqualified and d-mb. It's worse when they feel entitled to steal credit for all your work. Its no better than colonialism or apartheid.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @udt+1n9FsCHp

What a narcissist mess. Nobody is going to read the memoirs of a nobody who liberal guilted their way into a banking job

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iet+1n9FsCHp

There is a woke plague haunting Capone. Ot allows unqualified racist professional victims to roam the halls. Your protected status was why you were hired. You must be completely incompetent or just a hateful miserable person to be in that class and still fired.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qqd+1n9FsCHp

Those things under the CIO Rob A. are also incompetent country bumpkins who need to be fired to save the company from meltdown and ruin.

Show them no mercy cuz they show no one mercy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @het+1n9FsCHp

OP had me until "I am a protected class". As a female in IT, I've faced my fair share of adversity. But bias is never the first conclusion I come to, and documenting a nasty response on a review is not going to put OP in a good light in the long term. Capone has issues in the way they treat employees. Going from 0 to 150 on them will not fix anything. Getting a lawyer involved does not guarantee a payday at the end either.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @glt+1n9FsCHp

I applaud the original poster we know how the stack rankings, PIPs, and firings work. So the poster demonstrated a playbook to counteract stack rankings and PIPs. If you ARE a white man or woman when stack ranked you can make the same argument if you're older have a disabilty or if your boss is non white. And if you're white woman you are protected. Don't forget to leave out any disability or maternity or paternity leave.

How many of you stack ranked unfairly and threatened with a coaching plan and PIP would have done it differently? Learn from the poster. And if they do give you a cheap necklace as a reward for your hard work you gave a right to be angry and throw it into a garbage can.

Everyone can learn from this poster.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pgq+1n9FsCHp

I totally believe the original poster that old male white boss felt obligated to steal credit because he didn't want to be stack ranked. So he turned around stole it and stack ranked the employee instead to save himself.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lup+1n9FsCHp

I’m sorry that happened to you. Good luck with everything, I hope it works out for you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yzm+1n9FsCHp

You sound pretty racist and angry. I can’t stand imagine you have many friends at work that dont also see themselves as perpetual victims

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sdq+1n9FsCHp

Capital one is anti-white and you have a minority crying over his white boss lmao

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rqn+1n9FsCHp

Most likely you were given priority when hired because you are NOT a white male. Capital One loves to hire and promote non-white males. Your job performance is probably awful and your rating confirms this. While your non-white privilege may have gotten your foot in the door, you still have to perform to avoid inconsistent. IF you are a minority and you get a bad review, look hard at your performance because it is probably not everybody else that is the problem. You cannot rely on your privilege. As previous poster noted, you sound like a racist gem.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pcy+1n9FsCHp

Sounds like your biggest gripe is whiteness. It makes you sound like a racist.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gzi+1n9FsCHp

Post a reply

: