I honestly don’t understand how all of these well compensated employees are constantly complaining about having to go to work. I mean, COVID has been over for years. Mr. Stankey is right when he says show up for work or seek employment elsewhere.
14 replies (most recent on top)
@da The argument is quit you whiner.
@c9 worked from home over a decade before Covid. What’s your argument now, troll?
I worked remote for over a decade before Covid. Anyone who says the Covid narrative is clueless union goon. RTO will end or this company will continue to crumble. We aren’t even in the top 3 in telecom anymore, we have now slipped to number 5.
As your uncle trump would say low IQ post
@cc unlimited vacation?!?! You should never show up and test that theory.
Congrats
@c9 funny you say that as I just accepted an offer. The market is opening up and ATT Is about to have a wave of people leaving. The ones they can’t afford to lose, the non-pension folks. New company is 2-3x per month in office or when necessary, and is paying me $43k more per year with better benefits and unlimited vacation.
@bz So when you got to work from home during COVID should they have lowered your compensation during that period?
A bunch of whiners on this thread. If you think compensation and RTO are better elsehwere....this is America. You have a choice. QUIT!
@bj "Once you give somebody a temporary benefit they expect it forever."
First of all, on a long enough time line everything is temporary, so AT&T is temporary! AT&T offered WFH opportunities since the late 1990s when laptops became affordable. This perk was never managed from the very top until Stank decided he wanted to reduce the employees by 70K employees. So GFYS!
Well compensated is debatable. That being said if everyone else is hybrid or fully remote, which most everyone is, then the compensation for 5x should be higher than the market. News flash, it ain’t. Att is still living on the old pension plan comp program where you can pay under market because well, you get a pension when you retire. That is done. They want a market based culture, then need to pay market wages or higher. They are under market by most measures.
Shine on you crazy diamond
No. It's fine if a benefit is changed or removed.
The problem begins when a benefit removal results in direct and repeated additional costs to the employee. The problem deepens when no new or increased benefit arrives to maintain some semblance of equilibrium.
Hope this helps.
Once you give somebody a temporary benefit they expect it forever. Human nature
Thank you JS
Now go work on getting T stock up!
The guy is clueless, has no plan, and needs to resign effective immediately. Stink is a proven loser with a record of zero wins. He’s a bonafide scrub. Compensation is well below industry average, and not a single employee supports or believes in the clown. One of the worst cultures in the world for a reason. @OP is just a troll. You can ignore this post from here on.