If you look up the distribution, some have say 40,000 personnel, some have like only 400. Why not reduce footprint? - move these to capital cities etc
1 reply
1000% bang on.
- Less overhead – Smaller offices cost a bo-b to run.
- More bang for buck – Bigger hubs mean better use of resources.
- Bigger talent pool – Easier to hire top talent in major cities.
- Closer to the action – More customers, partners and opportunities.
- Better collaboration – Teams together, less mucking around.
- Smarter spending – Less cash tied up in offices, more to invest in growth.
Bottom line ? Cut the fat, boost efficiency, and put the money where it actually makes a difference.
Btw the smallest hubs are NOT even in the U.S. Even more of a case to consolidate or at least move PS to America.