Thread regarding Bank of New York Mellon Corp. layoffs

Jobs Offshore, Tax Credits Onshore, Profits Everywhere

The real issue isn't India, Poland, or visa holders. The real issue is transparency from elected politicians, government agencies (EEOC, Dept of Labor) and corporate accountability.

Companies like BNY can move work to lower-cost locations and call it "transformation," "modernization," or "talent strategy." Employees see something different: jobs moving offshore, more visa hires coming onshore, experienced workers disappearing, and very little public reporting that shows the true impact on the U.S. workforce.

Politics matters, but this isn't a Democrat-versus-Republican issue. Both parties have supported globalization, visa programs, and economic policies that help large employers stay competitive. Neither seems particularly interested in requiring companies to disclose how many U.S. jobs are being moved overseas versus how many are actually being created here.

BNY, like many large banks, benefits from visa pipelines. The company gains access to reasonably skilled resources, lower turnover, and workers whose immigration status is often tied to employer sponsorship. In some cases, recent F‑1/OPT and other visa-program participants may also offer payroll or tax advantages compared to hiring experienced domestic workers.

At the same time, state and local governments hand out tax credits and incentives for job creation. On paper, it looks like growth and investment. To many employees, it looks like experienced workers being replaced with lower-cost alternatives. Look at US sites in Pittsburgh, Jersey City, NYC, and Lake Mary.

That's why people keep asking the same questions and with good reason:

How many U.S. jobs were offshored?
How many experienced workers were replaced?
How many positions were filled through visa programs?
What tax incentives were received?
What is the long-term plan for U.S. careers?

Until government entities and companies like BNY start answering those questions honestly, employees will continue assuming the worst. From their perspective, the jobs keep disappearing while leadership keeps saying everything is going according to plan.


by
| 101 views | | 8 replies (last 3 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m6ef8ayj

8 replies (most recent on top)

@qd
😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😆😆😆😆

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @16p+1m6ef8ayj

@qd It'd lefty policies that make it unaffordable to do anything in the US>

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @se+1m6ef8ayj

@qd

Ha ha. It means greater volume of H1B and other visas. It means fast tracking regularization/amnesty. It means faster paced offshoring.

By the time democrats are done, you won’t have a chance at a career unless you’re an immigrant, legal or undocumented.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qj+1m6ef8ayj

Now the that the Democrat party is taking over both Houses of Congress, we'll see if government increases oversight accountability with corporate offshoring and visa abuses. Don't count on BNY taking the high road as they exploit every loophole.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qd+1m6ef8ayj

@c2
The same one who loves socialism, hates the constitution and says ‘punish the rich!!!’ Except ‘the rich’ means anyone with job who cant run away

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c7+1m6ef8ayj

There is certainly one political party that makes it WAAAAY more expensive to hire people in the US and WAAAAY more expensive and difficult to conduct business in the US.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c2+1m6ef8ayj

Our politicians and local govt enforcement agencies share a huge blame here. BNY is a US based company and US based companies should only be hiring offshore for skillsets and labor coverage that is NOT available in the US. Clearly that isnt what is happening. BNY and companies that do this enjoy tax breaks and incentives while putting Americans on unemployment which tax payers must bear.
Huge problem and huge corruption

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1m6ef8ayj

"reasonably skilled resources" Except, for those of us stateside citizens who actually have to work with them, "reasonably skilled" is not the reality at all.

Frequently there are huge communication issues as they are not native English speakers in a lot of cases, and they require a lot of handholding as they cannot infer extra details without having to have it spelled out in detail for them. Nevermind the work quality issues.

So, basically, its a situation of "you get what you pay for." Why pay more for experienced people who can get the work done right the first time and communicate more readily when you can pay someone a tiny fraction of the salary and get a heaping pile of sh-t that an expensive resource has to end up cleaning up anyways?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1m6ef8ayj

Post a reply

: