I've designed a new ranking system. Employees are ranked only during their first ten years. After ten years, they receive tenure and are guaranteed employment, benefits, and peace.
Poor performance? Your salary stagnates. No raises. No promotions. But no PIPs, no layoffs, and no more competing against the pledges.
Only younger employees compete. They have the energy, ambition, and sufficient remaining lifespan to recover from defeat.
Tenured employees may supplement their income by placing bets on which younger employees will survive the annual ranking cycle.
We may also sponsor promising contestants, share institutional knowledge, and help our favorites avoid elimination. Participation is entirely voluntary.
The young compete. The tenured observe.
After decades in the arena, we've earned the right to sit in the stands.
Preferably with popcorn. Thoughts? The only thing I'm flexible on the number of years. Should it be 10 years, 15, 20? Also supervisors dont rank, the tenured employees rank by voting