Nothing new came out of the town hall today. We continue to hear claims about how well the company is doing, while many of us see significant problems that suggest otherwise.
I believe there are serious questions that need to be addressed regarding potential financial and compliance issues, particularly around Gainwell shifting development work offshore for states where we may not have authorization or contractual provisions allowing that work to be performed offshore, including Missouri, Texas, and Ohio.
There are also concerns that POs are being instructed not to include state names on state-specific work. If this is occurring, it raises serious questions about transparency, compliance, and whether the company is intentionally obscuring the nature or destination of the work.
These issues deserve a clear and transparent explanation, including where the work is being performed, what the contracts allow, and why state-specific work would be documented in a way that does not identify the state.