Thread regarding Verizon Wireless layoffs

VZ had never been a leader but a follower

I fully disagree with being a 2020 tech company. This was something dreamed up by Lowell since the tech.stocks were increasing and telecom was not.

The Vodafone partnership interest acquisition was a disaster and VZ over paid at least $30 billion. This is what happens when a CEO wants something no matter the cost and negotiates the deal.

VZ had never been a leader but a follower. Would never go to market until some other carrier tested the waters. Except 5G which was not 5G because at the time of the hype the World GSM had not even established the standards for 5G. One example of incompetence. For more examples review VZ acquisitions then a short time later divest at a huge loss. They wanted every company to be like VZ and that is not progress.

VZ loses customers and attempts to attract new customers. We all know it costs less to keep a customer than to obtain a new one. This is the we do not provides those types offers in VZ.

I working in M&A years ago for 3 years and would ask the attorney why we refused to move on a point that had no meaning. The answer was always because we are VZ.

An on point post from @ntm+1l3qQbXu.

by
| 1862 views | | 5 replies (last February 13, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1l4RaOEG

5 replies (most recent on top)

Lowell was a major problem, trying to set up this huge international company we were never going to be. Overpaying on Vodaphone's part, giving corporate millions to his Alma Mater, buying the Terramark properties and then ditching storage, going ahead with the Yahoo purchase, even after the Data Breach fall out and looping another unlimited legal goat $crew around the co's neck. Finally, picking the absolute worst candidate to lead us after his retirement as part of his vision

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6caa+1l4RaOEG

Lowell was a large part of the problem-

When he overpaid utilizing debt for the Vodaphone interest, the company entered the tailspin it is in. His gamble on the future of LTE and 5G was that we would be able to raise rates and charge per gb of data and as usage went up bills would be 200- 300 more.

It is when we began coming under fire by T Mobile utilizing a cost cutting strategy that we no longer were able to keep up with. It conflicted where the predictions of rates would go. Between their low prices and unlimited data, we had to pivot.

To save the stock price and numbers and conceal the true number of connections we were losing month after month and quarter after quarter and stabilize revenues, we replaced valuable phone lines with fraudulent tablet, and mobile Hotspot lines through the retail, b2b and telesales channels. It doesn't sound so bad when we only lose a few thousand lines in a quarter but if anyone peeled back the onion they would realize that VZW was a sh-t show losing 40 dollar phone lines and replacing them with 10s and 20s.

We then started this pivot looking for operational savings and nickel and diming on our employees. Changing comp plans, ridiculous forecasting, and finally straight turning over people through layoffs and making those left to pick up the slack and doing 2 or 3 positions for the same measly salary. This caused a brain drain within our operation and anyone with a brain who could do more, went to the open market. We then laid off a ton of the experienced loyal workers which caused those left to be a rudderless ship.

The pressures from T Mobile and our staffing crisis caused the debt we incurred to be a problem, so we had to double down and further gamble on an incorrect 5g strategy. We no longer could invest correctly back into the network which is our competitive advantage, and the reason we were able to charge a premium for services. We took a gamble that ridiculously fast 5g speeds would wow customers into staying. This failed on multiple fronts:
1- the technology doesn't work beyond a few feet and heaven forbid there is a wall, window or other obstruction, all that speed does not work
2- people do not care for extremely high speeds, they just want to be able to load Instagram or watch videos where ever so coverage and stability is the most important choice for consumers and most businesses.
3- we bought the wrong spectrum to accomplish the long term desires and demands of customers.
4- Business customers do NOT care about ridiculous speeds either, if it is not consistent where ever they go.

All this while between T Mobile and sprint moving plus their auction acquisitions T mobile is now poised to serve those needs our customers.

And all we do is aggravate the customers we have left nickel and diming them, as well as being super frustrating to do business with.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2rhe+1l4RaOEG

I wish Lowell was still around maybe this company wouldn’t have been as bad

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2agv+1l4RaOEG

We never lost when Lowell was around. This new leadership team has bet on the wrong horse. The network is now behind other carriers, yet we charge a premium. Hopefully Wall Street hands out pink slips where they belong! C-Suite!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1axn+1l4RaOEG

So. What does this have to do with anything?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @upb+1l4RaOEG

Post a reply

: