Thread regarding Citigroup Inc. / Citibank / Citi layoffs

So Citi has we-ponized Big 4 consulting firms

post below has been copy pasted from Reddit, but sounds legit - sneaky and underhanded enough for Citi - because nothing, and I mean nothing, is below Citi's dignity as a firm. And the Big 4 consulting firm in question? Very likely PwC, the alma mater of some high up leaders at Citi. Or maybe EY

Post Source:Reddit

Ex Big 4 employee here. I hate to say it but more cuts are coming. I can’t say which Big 4 firm specifically, but this firm and bank have a model where Big 4 firm finds and hires the offshore India resources, proceeds to train them for certain bank roles and then essentially offloads those resources to bank’s books if bank ultimately decides they want those resources. Bank then lays off those in roles that the offshore resources were trained on and replaces the laid off employees with said resources while using “AI developments” and “economic conditions” as the final excuse. For them, it’s a great deal. Cheap resources they didn’t have to find, onboard, and train themselves while paying a structured fee to the Big 4 firm that bank gets to write off. Cheap and easy but certainly controversial. Also just inherently wrong. Bank will eventually realize that these offshore resources actually su-k and the quality of work is so bad that it will only create more work and operational constraints. Remaining employees in hard hit areas will have to manage and deal with the headache of these offshore resources while taking on greater workloads. 1st line is likely the most insulated from this. Anywhere else, best of luck. Sorry.


by
| 2 views | | 8 replies (last 20 hours ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kv9fzwp8

8 replies (most recent on top)

@aq also eaten up by the cost of AI

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @et+1kv9fzwp8

Wishful thinking - just take your lumps and severance and move on with life.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d9+1kv9fzwp8

@OP Now we know why Citibank has 13 layers of executive management, which they insist they want to collapse to eight layers.

Every stateside manager needs an Indian mirror. This “globalization” of tech and data and operations has indeed resulted in lower unit costs. But that cost savings has been eaten up by layers of managing directors in the corporate bureaucracy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aq+1kv9fzwp8

@a9 oops here's the link to the Goldman story so far in 2026:

https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/goldman-sachs-shatters-dealmaking-records-with-1-trillion-first-half-ma-volume-2026-06-16/

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1kv9fzwp8

@a6 Citi can only dream of earning 2B+ in M&A fees from business conducted worth north of 1 trillion. Till 2023-24, Citi M&A's mergers and acquisiton deal platform was running off of a Sql Server platform built in the 2000's lol. It took Citi nearly a quarter of a century to upgrade its deal platform

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1kv9fzwp8

@a5 Nope, can't be accenture as Accenture is a Services firm and is not counted amongst the 'Big 4'. Neithger is IBM, Cognizant etc - all are services firm. The big 4 are the accounting firms with a consulting arm - EY, Deloitte, KPMG and PwC. Some spun off their consulting arms in the 2000's which result in the birth of an Accenture but recreated the consulting arm later on and today treat a firm as either Channel 1 or Channel 2 client - 1 is an audit client so other typers of work is severely restricted due to conflict of interest (but money hungry leaders will blur those lines as well to make a quick buck) and Channel 2 is any client that isn't an audit client

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1kv9fzwp8

@OP

GS, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, etc. Sh!ttibank's envied Competitors do NOT do what you described.

Gee, wonder why they're soooo successful and continue to Beat Shi!ttibank's AS$ ??

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1kv9fzwp8

If it is Accenture they are terrible, still better than our people but awful, the leave after 6mos. Ask Barclays.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1kv9fzwp8

Post a reply

: