Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Something has to change

Can we declare independence from this “leadership” team? Because honestly, the disconnect has become absurd. Employees are living in reality while the executives operate from some alternate universe where everything is “strong,” “aligned,” and “on track,” even as the stock flatlines, morale tanks, and talent runs for the exits.

We could keep this company running without half the people making seven-digit salaries. And that’s not exaggeration. One senior exec’s compensation equals hundreds of actual workers who deliver real value every single day. Yet we’re the ones getting squeezed while they burn billions on failed bets, broken strategies, and ego-driven decisions.

They talk about “culture” like it’s a slogan. They talk about “market-based” like it’s a shield. Meanwhile the only thing that feels truly market-based is their obsession with treating employees like disposable commodities.

This place is being run like a closed-off regime where questioning leadership is treated like heresy and any discomfort is reframed as “resistance to change.” But here’s the truth they don’t want to face:

The employees are not the problem.
The culture is not the employees.
The disconnect is coming from the top.

Something has to change. The people actually doing the work feel it. Customers feel it. The market feels it. And leadership? They’re the only ones who don’t.

At some point, they need to realize that loyalty, trust, and performance don’t come from mandates and pressure. They come from leadership that actually leads.

We’re overdue for that kind of leadership.

by
| 1201 views | | 14 replies (last November 27) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kae4p9gn

14 replies (most recent on top)

The day I retired I cut all my AT&T services for better deals.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1c3+1kae4p9gn

Who is considered the "leadership" team? Stankey and who else? Seems like Stankey is a dictator

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wv+1kae4p9gn

"At some point, they need to realize that loyalty, trust, and performance don’t come from mandates and pressure."

They have outright stated on townhalls that they don't want your loyalty. I'll be glad not to give it to them. I use third party carriers for both my broadband and cell service. I'm market based and unloyal. That is what they desire.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @r3+1kae4p9gn

ATT at work at has gone completely downhill and everyone is talking within the company below the AVPs and agree. We have gone back to the 80’s but worse tracked for 8hrs days. Guess what we have the lazy and we HAD those that worked more than 8hrs ( we had but no longer ). Because they want at least 8 hrs well they are only getting that now. The Harvard graduate consultant company ATT used for advise has given the employee moral a punch in the a-s as in no longer care just do your 8hrs and DO NOT login in at home!
So LEGG and McFresh you both really have messed up ATT employee that were dedicated while you all sit in your private office we Are collaborating each day with a wall, while we all sit in call center style you both sit quietly each day in your office Collaborating via teams.
All know you are trying to break employees mentality. One last thing, you gig what you got those near a hub of dozens are saved no matter even if a bad worker

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @n8+1kae4p9gn

Not worried and safe with a union contract.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bt+1kae4p9gn

“ We could keep this company running without half the people making seven-digit salaries. And that’s not exaggeration.”

We have been doing just that for a long time. Plugging all the holes and gaps with fingers and toes for so long. All with little to no budgets for anything. It’s all the senior techs and L2s keep this place going. The L2 mafia is what makes it all happen working back room deals and favors to keep it going. If we stopped working as hard as we did this place would fail. We all do it despite the terrible decisions coming from above. Those are just the facts.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1kae4p9gn

A possible but risky solution. A massive, massive walkout by all management employees across the company. It's probably not plausible, but that would send a powerful message to the BOD. They can't fire everyone, the company would implode. There are not enough Stanky boot lickers to keep the network, support and systems running. Demand his resignation and go back to work. Wishful thinking I know, but it would work and it would garner global attention.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @av+1kae4p9gn

I cannot wait for the stock to go back below $20 so I can farm the tears of the AT&T sycophants on this board as they’re obviously the only people besides institutions that actually hold this garbo stock.

It’s going to be sublime.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aq+1kae4p9gn

We make communication go.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ap+1kae4p9gn

This place is making me hate my life.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ak+1kae4p9gn

Change is constant. In this case, the only change that stank cares about is our employment status, preferring that we leave on our own.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1kae4p9gn

The only change you can rely on with this company is employment status. That's what Stankey wants.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1kae4p9gn

As soon as you realize large, publicly traded companies are enterprise level grifts where 401k money flows in and executive compensation packages go up, it all starts to make sense.

Tell a story, any story, make it just fuzzy enough to pass the simplest of smell tests and the money keeps flowing in.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1kae4p9gn

As long as greed and ego are the motivating factors for the company, we’ve got no hope for change.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1kae4p9gn

Post a reply

: