Thread regarding MetLife Inc. layoffs

Coming soon to Met

https://www.inc.com/kit-eaton/this-trendy-management-structure-harms-workplace-communication-a-survey-says/91233834

Fully 38 percent of survey respondents said that since their company experienced layoffs, their manager had become less accessible. This has had consequences: 30 percent of people said they’d felt less support when things were disrupted or changed, 34 percent expected they’ll lose a sense of connection and 30 percent expected decreased or zero access for mentorship and career development options.

Employees also don’t trust senior leaders, with nearly 40 percent saying they can’t get mentorship or guidance from upper management, 37 percent saying they feel unheard by the top leaders, and only 47 percent agreeing that their company leadership is “somewhat” transparent.

This paints an interesting picture of how the average U.S. worker views their management, relying on their direct supervisors while apparently distrusting upper layers of company leadership. The report quotes Firstup CEO Bill Schuh, who explained that the data show workers see middle managers as critical for “translating organizational priorities into action, clarity, and connection for their direct report.”

As companies shed middle managers, they risk losing this vital link, which can leave frontline workers feeling lost and unsupported. That discontent will likely diminish their engagement with their work, and could reduce their productivity. Meanwhile Schuh also noted that stripping managers out adds strain on their remaining colleagues. That means companies are “asking fewer managers to do more, and that simply is not sustainable,” he said. While AI is useful for handling some mundane managerial tasks, it “won’t replace the human connection and leadership that great managers provide.”


by
| 5211 views | | 5 replies (last September 4) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k46sxhz1

5 replies (most recent on top)

There is nothing worse than people who make a career out of performative communication and managing visibility instead of delivering value.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gf+1k46sxhz1

REFUSE to use the phrase "Leader." Leaders do not require that you call them Leaders. If you need to tell your underlings to refer to you as a Leader, you aren't.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dq+1k46sxhz1

Let’s all take a moment to appreciate the tireless efforts of middle managers. The great interpreters of calendars, forwarders of emails, and authors of status update decks no one reads. Truly, where would we be without the professional middlemen of modern corporate theater?

Seriously: most middle management exists not to lead, but to linger. They don’t own outcomes. They don’t create value. They sit between the people doing the work and the people making decisions, and somehow neither group trusts them.

They schedule meetings to “surface misalignments,” manufacture urgency around meaningless KPIs, and then vanish when real problems need solving. When the team succeeds, they take credit. When the team fails, they “raise visibility”, corporate code for pointing fingers and dodging accountability.

And yet, companies are afraid to cut them, because they’ve embedded themselves into the org like political barnacles. Feeding off ambiguity, inserting themselves into workflows just to justify their existence. The worst part? They often outlast the actual talent.

Here’s the brutal truth. If your value depends on being the person who “keeps everyone in the loop,” you're already obsolete. Slack, Notion, AI, and competent adults can do that without the overhead, ego, or politics.

Gut the performative layers. Strip out the optics-based careerists. Keep the leaders who roll up their sleeves and deliver outcomes. I'm of course speaking of better organizations than MetLife because we all know that this is a haven for career Gatekeepers, middle-management bloat, organizational cholesterol, and bureaucratic layering.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d2+1k46sxhz1

This website is like the NLRA, managers do not get to organize.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b6+1k46sxhz1

@OP this has been the case at Met for years, though. AVPs, VPs are brought in and specifically told they are not there to do the work, but rather to oversee the work. It's continued wasteful spending at Met. These are the middle managers Met refuses to eliminate. Too many at least in NYC for example.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ax+1k46sxhz1

Post a reply

: