Thread regarding U.S. Bank layoffs

who decided to put a CEO in charge that can’t even speak english????? Who talks about layoffs while wearing designer clothing???

can someone explain? the rest of the leadership acts like a buncha snowflakes that walk around with a stick up their a$$, who haven’t accomplished anything other than going to a fancy school.

This is crazy!!! also, can confirm the job market does su-k unless you have that special “pedigree” even though it means nothing

by
| 4441 views | | 16 replies (last August 12) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k20fqaep

16 replies (most recent on top)

"Bow to me peasants" - GK probably

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @155+1k20fqaep

@13y So you want to hire a CEO based on his/her name? I am guessing your gripe is that it isn't an anglo / English name? Dig deeper in your head and tell us if a hispanic/black person would work or is the top dog position is reserved for blonde hair, blue eyed anglo/viking types only?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @146+1k20fqaep

Who decided it was a good idea to put someone with “G-n” in their first name as the president. It feels as if she’s here to take us all out literally. She’s living up to her name.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @13y+1k20fqaep

@r3 Andy probably purposely wanted to put a failure like GK in charge. This way, when the bank fails he can say all was good when he was the guy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wk+1k20fqaep

Who decided? Andy did. He made two big mistakes - Union Bank acquisition and Gunjan as his successor. Mistakes that will ultimately end this 150+ year old bank. Real sad.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @r3+1k20fqaep

@ej multiple things can be true here. Yes, nothing is abysmal but 1-2 percent is also abysmal. We can all get behind the sentiment that it's all unacceptable for a company that posts billions in revenue each quarter.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ex+1k20fqaep

@b9 For the past 8 years I have had extraordinary performance reviews and my increases have only gone further south. I didn't even get an increase this year. So while everyone is complaining about 1% - 5% raises, just remember there are people out there with top marks getting NOTHING!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ej+1k20fqaep

@b9 Even the difference in the raise that I got for going from meaningful the year prior to extraordinary last year to was laughable. Not even worth putting in the extra effort when it’s barely a difference.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cw+1k20fqaep

@as She’s so full of sh-t. Everyone I know gets 4-5% yearly raises but not in this bank of course. People are getting sc--wed here. Where the he-l is my raise for even doing multiple jobs in the first place. I’m only getting paid for one job, definitely not three I have been doing for years now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b9+1k20fqaep

@aj but according to her our wages are competitive and our raises keep up with COL and are GENEROUS.

Like what? Our measly 1.5-2% (if we're lucky) hasn't kept pace for, well, my entire career.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1k20fqaep

Honestly I hope they all go down with her. I’m so exhausted of doing nearly 3 people’s job without a salary increase that I daily imagine them all in worse case scenario. That 2-3% merit is not doing jack sh-t. Learn how to pay people fair wages, you a--holes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aj+1k20fqaep

2 years before she is gone...and she will have unfortunately have caused quite a bit of damage before she is removed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1k20fqaep

Augustana and Northern Iowa University are fancy schools? Who knew?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1k20fqaep

McKinsey decided.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1k20fqaep

@a2 This is so true........ talk about totally disconnected from what's going on at the ground floor

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1k20fqaep

It's not complicated. All the executives have no technical background and are obsolete in the modern economy. They will destroy the firm trying to hold onto their incomes for ~3 more years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1k20fqaep

Post a reply

: